a wtp
#1
Posted 2009-June-30, 05:33
QTxxx
AJx
Axx
1♥-2♠-3♥-p
??
Unfav. You have agreed something similar to the agreement recently described by gnasher, i.e. partner bids 4♥ on most limit raises.
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2009-June-30, 06:14
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2009-June-30, 06:24
I'm passing here though... Partner needs a really good hand. xx AKxx x xxxxxx would probably bid 4♥, x Kxxx Kxxx QJT9 is about the best it would get (we might have missed slam then )
This post has been edited by mtvesuvius: 2009-June-30, 08:01
#5
Posted 2009-June-30, 07:56
mtvesuvius, on Jun 30 2009, 07:24 AM, said:
I'm passing here though... Partner needs a really good hand. xxx AKxx x xxxxxx would probably bid 4♥, x Kxxx Kxxx QJT9 is about the best it would get (we might have missed slam then )
If I held 14 cards I would bid game. I am a heavy favorite to win trick 14 for my 10th trick.
#6
Posted 2009-June-30, 08:01
ArtK78, on Jun 30 2009, 08:56 AM, said:
mtvesuvius, on Jun 30 2009, 07:24 AM, said:
I'm passing here though... Partner needs a really good hand. xxx AKxx x xxxxxx would probably bid 4♥, x Kxxx Kxxx QJT9 is about the best it would get (we might have missed slam then )
If I held 14 cards I would bid game. I am a heavy favorite to win trick 14 for my 10th trick.
Edited now, my keyboard hates me today.
#7
Posted 2009-June-30, 08:21
I'm torn onthis one.
I suspect that I'd bid 4♥ at IMPs. (Playing 3♥ is shooting at a pretty small target).
MPs I'd lean more towards passing
#8
Posted 2009-June-30, 08:28
#9
Posted 2009-June-30, 11:58
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2009-June-30, 15:19
Certainly not a wtp, since game may well make, but
depending on style, partner may have nothing more
than an av. 2H call, i.e. even 3H can go down more
than one.
This hand showes, why it makes sense to add. another
raise of openers major to your existing agreements,
since another raise will make the range of the hands
qualifying for a direct 3H raise smaller.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: I would have opened 1H, but of course this is a matter
of partnership agreements.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2009-July-01, 00:16
Agree that this shouldve been opened 1NT.
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#12
Posted 2009-July-01, 01:01
I do not mind 1 NT or 1 Heart...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#13
Posted 2009-July-01, 02:08