Spade bomb on a misfitting hand
#1
Posted 2009-June-12, 08:07
♥Kx
♦x
♣Qxx
1♥ 1♠
3♦ ??
3♦ is invitational (around 15-16) with 5-5
1♥ 2♠ would have been 6♠ 9-11.
#2
Posted 2009-June-12, 08:28
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#3
Posted 2009-June-12, 08:30
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#4
Posted 2009-June-12, 09:24
Poky, on Jun 12 2009, 09:07 AM, said:
♥Kx
♦x
♣Qxx
1♥ 1♠
3♦ ??
3♦ is invitational (around 15-16) with 5-5
1♥ 2♠ would have been 6♠ 9-11.
If jumpshift is invitational, what would be gameforcing? I don't know of anybody else who plays that 3D is only invitational.
Anyway, in your methods, 4S now.
#5
Posted 2009-June-12, 09:38
peachy, on Jun 12 2009, 05:24 PM, said:
Then talk to a strong-club player. (Or similar.)
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#6
Posted 2009-June-12, 09:41
#7
Posted 2009-June-12, 09:48
jdonn, on Jun 12 2009, 10:41 AM, said:
Opposite GF jumpshift. Do you think it is best forcing also opposite invitational 3D?
Really, I don't actually need to know since I will never play invit JS, but interested in the argument why it should be forcing.
#8
Posted 2009-June-12, 09:52
peachy, on Jun 12 2009, 10:24 AM, said:
You get invitational and distributional jumps by opener, typically 5/5+, if you're playing precision or playing Gazilli in standard.
I might wish I was playing weak jump shifts here (1♥-2♠ as weak rather than invitational), since then it would be clear 3♠ is forcing after opener shows a maximum.
Lacking this, I'm glad I have such good spades and don't have too much in terms of extra strength which makes 4♠ acceptable.
#9
Posted 2009-June-12, 10:03
peachy, on Jun 12 2009, 10:48 AM, said:
jdonn, on Jun 12 2009, 10:41 AM, said:
Opposite GF jumpshift. Do you think it is best forcing also opposite invitational 3D?
Really, I don't actually need to know since I will never play invit JS, but interested in the argument why it should be forcing.
Because you might have this hand. Or a hand where you don't know whether 4♠ or 3NT is best. Those are more important than just wanting to sign off in 3♠. When that is the case you can either play in one of opener's suits or get one level higher, it's probably not a disaster. The game and slam decisions are way more important.
It's similar reasoning to why 1♦ 1♥, 3♦ 3♥ is forcing in standard bidding.
#10
Posted 2009-June-12, 10:32
Partner has 5-5 and invitational, right? So, he has a decent chance of having a stiff club, but probably has a stiff (or void) spade. However, if he has both Aces in the reds (one is probably sure), then 6♠ looks like a fairly good contract.
Now, I assume that you have some agreement as to follow-up, right?
Well, I'm wanting to know what bids I have available. I cannot imagine agreeing to play invitational jump shifts like this without any discussion of what bids mean after the jump shift.
-P.J. Painter.
#11
Posted 2009-June-12, 11:12
So that's what I will bid, not giving up on slam.
#12
Posted 2009-June-12, 11:22
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#13
Posted 2009-June-12, 18:08
If 3♠ isn't forcing, how about 5♠? We can hardly have three top losers, so the main risk is that we have two aces and a trump to lose. Whilst I hate going off at the five level, I think it's probably worth the risk to try to get to slam opposite x AQxxx Axxxx Kx + wastage.
#14
Posted 2009-June-12, 20:08
#15
Posted 2009-June-12, 20:17
.... either a stiff or K x .
#16
Posted 2009-June-13, 03:37
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#17
Posted 2009-June-13, 03:41
helene_t, on Jun 13 2009, 12:12 AM, said:
So that's what I will bid, not giving up on slam.
No we didn't. That was over a forcing 3D bid. Given the conditions, this is a clear 4S.
#18
Posted 2009-June-13, 03:51
ONEferBRID, on Jun 13 2009, 03:17 AM, said:
.... either a stiff or K x .
If that's what it means, we risk reaching slam opposite x QJ10xx AKQxx Kx, which would be bad.
#19
Posted 2009-June-13, 10:50
gnasher, on Jun 13 2009, 04:51 AM, said:
ONEferBRID, on Jun 13 2009, 03:17 AM, said:
.... either a stiff or K x .
If that's what it means, we risk reaching slam opposite x QJ10xx AKQxx Kx, which would be bad.
It would be bad even reaching the 5 level opposite that hand a substantial minority of the time.
#20
Posted 2009-June-13, 11:15
in my system
3♥ 4♦ are not forcing
3♠ is forcing i vote that