wow double
#1
Posted 2009-June-10, 14:26
p-1N-p-p
x
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2009-June-10, 14:38
#3
Posted 2009-June-10, 14:53
xxx
x
KJxxx
Qxxx
or so maybe?
#4
Posted 2009-June-10, 15:12
mtvesuvius, on Jun 11 2009, 08:53 AM, said:
xxx
x
KJxxx
Qxxx
or so maybe?
That seems incredibly dangerous on a non-fit auction.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#5
Posted 2009-June-10, 15:36
Cascade, on Jun 10 2009, 04:12 PM, said:
mtvesuvius, on Jun 11 2009, 08:53 AM, said:
xxx
x
KJxxx
Qxxx
or so maybe?
That seems incredibly dangerous on a non-fit auction.
I didn't say it was a good bid
#6
Posted 2009-June-10, 17:25
#7
Posted 2009-June-10, 17:30
gnasher, on Jun 11 2009, 11:25 AM, said:
Its only good if you have an agreement.
Without an agreement I think I would auto-pass this double.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#8
Posted 2009-June-11, 00:41
It is called penalty double and was out of fashion even before he was born.
The surprising concept is, that you double them when you think they will fail.
You should play this in junior events and your score will skyrocket through the ceiling.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#9
Posted 2009-June-11, 01:35
Codo, on Jun 11 2009, 06:41 AM, said:
It is called penalty double and was out of fashion even before he was born.
The surprising concept is, that you double them when you think they will fail.
You should play this in junior events and your score will skyrocket through the ceiling.
But then it's a junior who has opened 1♥ in third seat (as he happens to be, coincidently).
#10
Posted 2009-June-11, 01:46
Cascade, on Jun 11 2009, 12:30 AM, said:
I thought we were discussing the merits of (a) agreeing to play this double as takeout and (b) making a takeout double on xxx x KJxxx Qxxx.
If when you said that it was "incredibly dangerous on a non-fit auction" you meant that it was dangerous to do it without prior agreement, I agree.
#11
Posted 2009-June-11, 03:23
Btw a hand interested in penalizing opps would start with rdbl, then opener can dbl 1NT if he has a real opening. Or maybe this pair swapped pass and rdbl? Never seen that but I have thought about that it might be fun to play.
I think it should be a specific t/o, probably showing both minors. Not that it will come up very frequently since responder will normally have some spades in this auction. But 5-5 minors is the only thing I can think of.
Without discussion I would never make this dbl.