BBO Discussion Forums: Ruling please - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ruling please failure to alert

#21 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,726
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2009-June-09, 11:20

jdonn, on Jun 8 2009, 09:36 PM, said:

skaeran, on Jun 8 2009, 01:25 PM, said:

(at IMPs it's obvious to switch to a low heart)

You are definitely good enough to tell me if I'm missing something, but why couldn't declarer be Axx Kxx x KQTxxx? In fact, that hand is about a million times more likely than the actual hand in which he had 9 top tricks, no?

Yeah, obviously you're right Josh.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#22 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2009-June-10, 04:08

I agree with Josh. With proper explanations, East could have doubled 3♥. And with proper explanations West could have led a heart regardless of what East did. I would assign 3NT-1 at any form of scoring.

As an aside, if you want an unbiased and objective ruling, write your post as neutral and objective as possible. I know that it is hard to be objective. But is is easy to avoid comments such as "NS mysteriously play 3♥ as ...", "It's a free world." and "Perhaps dreaming partner had...".

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#23 User is offline   shevek 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 707
  • Joined: 2006-September-29
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:whippets<br>anarchy<br>relay

Posted 2009-June-12, 18:04

Trinidad, on Jun 10 2009, 05:08 AM, said:

I agree with Josh. With proper explanations, East could have doubled 3♥. And with proper explanations West could have led a heart regardless of what East did. I would assign 3NT-1 at any form of scoring.

As an aside, if you want an unbiased and objective ruling, write your post as neutral and objective as possible. I know that it is hard to be objective. But is is easy to avoid comments such as "NS mysteriously play 3♥ as ...", "It's a free world." and "Perhaps dreaming partner had...".

Rik

okay.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

7 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users