Posted 2009-April-21, 09:22
I think the greater concern, IMO, is not just between trying for 9 tricks in a red contract or taking a marginal set against 2♠. This hand is looking really nice for a possible 3NT contract.
I mean, every single suit has exactly what I would want for a marginal 3NT contract. I don't just have Qx in spades -- I have the 10 also, assuredly a complete double stop. I have J10xx in two red suit, each of which is well-positioned for finesses that will succeed much more often than not. I have the K10x in clubs, which adds to the chances of clubs providing a trick source as well.
The problem is that 3NT from my side is probably unstoppable but that ship has sailed. Partner cannot know, however, that K9x or A9x is HUGE and that A8x or K8x might be powerful as well.
Not sure on this one. I might just take the plunge and bid 3NT. I don't care about missing a heart fit, as 3NT is probably the most likely game even if we have a heart fit.
Passing is probably the wise choice, but I'm not always wise.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.