Artificial Raises 1S-1N; 2H-...
#1
Posted 2009-March-30, 09:11
Does anyone have experience with this or care to comment otherwise?
In context we play 1M-3m as natural, invitational. You could get the best of all worlds, it seems, by playing this jump as weak and 2/1 in a minor GF except when suit rebid but that is not a structure that really interests me.
Does this gain more often than it loses?
#2
Posted 2009-March-30, 09:21
#3
Posted 2009-March-30, 09:32
ArtK78, on Mar 30 2009, 10:21 AM, said:
xx Axxx Axxx xxx
#4
Posted 2009-March-30, 10:04
So if you like playing 1M-3m as invitational (reasonable), maybe over 1M-1N-2OM or 1M-1N-2M you could play a 3m bid is a help suit game try for the last bid major. This gives you your courtesy raise as a less specific (or more specific) invitation.
Personally I think preemption via Bergen raises is quite valuable opposite limited openers and consequently I play 1M-3m as fitted raises. Therefore I play 1M-1N-2X-3m as invitational, but that's just my preference.
#5
Posted 2009-March-30, 10:18
#6
Posted 2009-March-30, 10:42
In retrospect, I might leave my pard in that 4-2 fit.
#7
Posted 2009-March-30, 12:26
If for example you play Gazzilli or perhaps BART (I don't know the details of BART) where you have an artificial way to invite then there is no need for this distinction as you only raise to 3♥ with a good hand.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#8
Posted 2009-March-30, 12:33
Gazzilli (or a strong club system) does help with this problem (BART doesn't help). On the given hand with two aces, you're pretty unlikely to have game opposite partner's 11-16 or so, especially if this range excludes 5-5 and 6-4 hands at the upper end.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#9
Posted 2009-March-30, 12:40
Playing 3m on a 6-0 or 6-1 fit. Good hand for the simulation types to determine which is better.
#10
Posted 2009-March-30, 12:45
keylime, on Mar 30 2009, 01:40 PM, said:
Playing 3m on a 6-0 or 6-1 fit. Good hand for the simulation types to determine which is better.
But a 6-1 fit is usually a lot better than a 4-2 fit. Yes, occasionally partner will have five hearts, but occasionally partner will have three cards in my minor too. And there are also hands with a seven card minor to consider, or with shapes like 2263 and a very good minor (and not much else).
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#11
Posted 2009-March-30, 13:31
#12
Posted 2009-March-30, 13:33
#13
Posted 2009-March-30, 18:39
keylime, on Mar 30 2009, 11:42 PM, said:
In retrospect, I might leave my pard in that 4-2 fit.
Dwayne?
x
xx
KQJTxxx
xxx
#14
Posted 2009-March-30, 21:03
#15
Posted 2009-March-30, 21:24
The_Hog, on Mar 30 2009, 07:39 PM, said:
Agree.