2C - Weak or GF
-2D - Eq majors or better spades (Max 4)
--2H / 2S - To play (2H is converted with better spades)
--2N - GF Relay
---3C - 3/3 Maj
----3D - Xfer H
----3H - Xfer S
---3D - 4/4 Maj
----3H - Xfer S
----3S - Relay 3N (Various follow ups??)
----3N - To play
----4C - 6KC
----4D - Xfer H
---3H - 3S/2H
---3S - 4S/2-3H Min
---3N - 4S/2-3H Max
----4C - ? Hearts
-----4D - 2
-----4H - 3
-2H - Better hearts (Can be 3-2, can be 5H-3-3-2)
--2S - Some sort of GF relay
-2S - 5S-3-3-2
2D / 2H - Weak or Inv transfers (GF hands start with 2C)
2S - Clubs or Diamonds or both minors (Weak / GF)
-2N - Better D
--3C - to play
--3D - to play
--3h GF clubs
--3s GF diamonds
2N - Inv Stayman, passible (all responses show an acceptance)
-3C - No 4M
-3D - Both 4M
-3M - 4M only
3m - Strictly Inv, something like Kxx xx KQJxxx xx maybe
3H/3S - Fragment / Splinter, GF
Just an idea that's been kicking around in my head for a while, mainly intended over 10-12 or similar.
Goals are as follows
Seperate GF and INV hands, so it is clear when it is our hand on tight competitive auctions.
Allow inv hands with a 5M to make game trys, without forcing to game
Page 1 of 1
New system for responding to weak NT
#2
Posted 2008-December-16, 05:50
I think my sytem is perfectly designed for your need. However its bad for slam bidding because like yours its a system without transfers and without a 100% GF stayman at a low level.
Here a quick summary.
3 level are GF with spades
3C is MSS
2NT is GF with H
2M to play
2D multi invitationnal. (or slammish with both majors)
2C almost a force to 2D.
1Nt-------2D
???
2H Pass or correct I want to play there if you have 5 or longer H inv.
2S i want to play there if you have 5 or longer S inv. But if you have H i supperaccept.
2Nt i super accept both M but i reject a balanced INV.
3C I accept all INV please respond in romex.
1Nt-------2C
???
2D almost forced
2H 5H and a minimum hand.
2S 5S and a minimum hand
1Nt-------2C
2D-------???
2H inv with 4H
2S inv with 4S.
2Nt GF with clubs
3C GF stayman.
rest is GF with diamonds.
This system worked so well for invitationnal hands that we decided to play an elastic weak nt and an elastic strong Nt. Send me a PM if you want the complete details.
Here a quick summary.
3 level are GF with spades
3C is MSS
2NT is GF with H
2M to play
2D multi invitationnal. (or slammish with both majors)
2C almost a force to 2D.
1Nt-------2D
???
2H Pass or correct I want to play there if you have 5 or longer H inv.
2S i want to play there if you have 5 or longer S inv. But if you have H i supperaccept.
2Nt i super accept both M but i reject a balanced INV.
3C I accept all INV please respond in romex.
1Nt-------2C
???
2D almost forced
2H 5H and a minimum hand.
2S 5S and a minimum hand
1Nt-------2C
2D-------???
2H inv with 4H
2S inv with 4S.
2Nt GF with clubs
3C GF stayman.
rest is GF with diamonds.
This system worked so well for invitationnal hands that we decided to play an elastic weak nt and an elastic strong Nt. Send me a PM if you want the complete details.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#3
Posted 2008-December-16, 07:09
The biggest disadvantage of your method is that you still use transfers for the hand types that are bad with transfers. Consider opposite 1NT 10-12:
Clearly if partner has 3-card ♥ support, you want to explore game, but probably not when he doesn't.
This is a condensed transfer. Good to hear you like it
Clearly if partner has 3-card ♥ support, you want to explore game, but probably not when he doesn't.
Quote
1Nt-------2D
???
2H Pass or correct I want to play there if you have 5 or longer H inv.
2S i want to play there if you have 5 or longer S inv. But if you have H i supperaccept.
???
2H Pass or correct I want to play there if you have 5 or longer H inv.
2S i want to play there if you have 5 or longer S inv. But if you have H i supperaccept.
This is a condensed transfer. Good to hear you like it
#4
Posted 2008-December-16, 08:51
Quote
This is a condensed transfer. Good to hear you like it
All INV hands with 4M (except 4M+6M) go into 2C---2D----2M
AQ5
axxxx
x
q7xx
This is near perfect for my method.
1Nt-----2D
???
here partner with a dead minimum (10-11) or an intermediate hand (12) with 2H will bid 2H and we will play there. With any other hand (13-14 or 12 with 3 card support) we will reach 4H,4S or 3Nt. The 3rd & 4 trump are very valuable but a dead minimum without ruffing power is still a dead minimum and the game we might missed are compensated by the time we are playing 2M making and 2Nt 3M is off. The bottom line when it come to invitationnal hands is if you avoid 2Nt and 3M contract as much as possible and play in the best game when game might be there you will do well.
The downside is that
1Nt----2D
2S!----2Nt (showing a balancedINV without 4M)
pass
You know that responder has no M and that opener superaccept H but not S so its scream for a S lead.
1Nt----2D
2H-----2Nt (showing a balancedINV without 4M)
3Nt
here opps know they have a H fit.
At first we were playing 11-14 but since we didnt missed that much game and almost never go overboard (except with balanced inv) that we decided to play 10-14 with 5M this is a move ill never regret. We are opening 1Nt way more often than 12-14 weak Nt and are burying opps fit by the tons.
There is no doubt in my mind that NV the wider weak Nt range 10-14,11-14,10-13 12-15 are the best range as long as you dont missed too much games and have a way to invite and stop low.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
Page 1 of 1