BBO Discussion Forums: How to interpret this? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

How to interpret this?

#1 User is offline   Quarky 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2008-November-25, 20:21

1st ever board playing with this partner, std 2/1. Team BAMs

Your hand as W:

42
AJ10754
43
AKQ

none vuln, LHO opens pass, bidding goes:

pass - pass - 1 - 2
4 - 5 - DBL -?

How do you interpret partner's 5 call and how do you proceed?
0

#2 User is offline   maggieb 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 339
  • Joined: 2008-October-15
  • Interests:Sewing, Cooking, and Square Dancing!

Posted 2008-November-25, 20:22

lead directing with hearts obviously
If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion. :)
0

#3 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-November-25, 23:38

Agree with the above. I bid 5H now. Pass would be invitational to 6.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#4 User is offline   Quarky 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2008-November-25, 23:56

ALright, i bid 5H also, went for -3 dbled, found pard with

x
x
QJ10xxxx
Jxxx

He complained "do you want to play 6D?"
0

#5 User is offline   maggieb 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 339
  • Joined: 2008-October-15
  • Interests:Sewing, Cooking, and Square Dancing!

Posted 2008-November-26, 00:04

I'm noticing two common themes in all your posts.
If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion. :)
0

#6 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2008-November-26, 00:11

maggieb, on Nov 26 2008, 01:04 AM, said:

I'm noticing two common themes in all your posts.

well, the partnership returns and exchanges desk is closed.
0

#7 User is offline   Quarky 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2008-November-26, 00:40

Don't get me wrong, posting here is not my way of releasing frustration and saying "my pard sucks." Bidding is my weakest spot, as I only know it from some reading and what I learned online (dont play face-to-face), so when these kind of situations arise, I don't know what the right understanding is and so ask here. I only know the familiar situations like uninterrupted low-level auctions.

Besides, a few of my posts are to discuss actions that "world class" players i played with on BBO disagree with (not saying they're wrong, could be a matter of style, but I can't trust just a single player labeled "WC," i want more opinions here).
0

#8 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,444
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2008-November-26, 01:49

I would've passed here. If they pass 5 (instead of double) then it is a harder problem.

Of course it makes some sense for 5 to show diamonds and hearts, but would I assume this opposite an unknown partner? I don't think that's reasonable. The double saves me from guessing. If partner has diamonds plus hearts he will clarify by bidding 5 himself. Otherwise we can play 5X. Sometimes you need to take a "safety play in the bidding" especially when you and partner are not on firm ground.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#9 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-November-26, 02:34

I doubt that any sane partner will pass first and later introduce their suit at the 5. level with the hand your partner had.
But Adam is right: Use the safety play and pass. Pd will clarify with pass or 5 Heart what he meant.

In theory this may show slam interesst but in your real life, don't care too much about that.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#10 User is offline   Quarky 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2008-November-26, 02:36

awm, on Nov 26 2008, 02:49 AM, said:

I would've passed here. If they pass 5 (instead of double) then it is a harder problem.

Of course it makes some sense for 5 to show diamonds and hearts, but would I assume this opposite an unknown partner? I don't think that's reasonable. The double saves me from guessing. If partner has diamonds plus hearts he will clarify by bidding 5 himself. Otherwise we can play 5X. Sometimes you need to take a "safety play in the bidding" especially when you and partner are not on firm ground.

Hmm, well my thoughts start with the same foundation but going in a completely opposite direction.

My thought was that since we had never played before, partner's 5 bid is not a diamond suit with no support for my hearts. Since he chose to take such action after passing initially and without much knowledge of what my overcall hand is like, i am sure he has support for my hearts and bid 5D simply as lead-directing in the event of 5S by opps or to offer me to play 5D with something like 3 hts and 6 diamonds in his hand. If it's the latter, then I am afraid to pass 5D-X, as pard might think "ok, sounds like he prefers our diamond fit, so lets play there" when in reality i prefer the heart fit (which i was expecting from pard).
0

#11 User is offline   ochinko 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 647
  • Joined: 2004-May-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Cooking

Posted 2008-November-26, 03:22

As Adam said, Pass is easy after the double. There is nothing to add to the 2 bid regarding strength or distribution. 5 is unilateral, and I don't see why it would show a weaker hand than Pass unless you have a specific agreement about that.

There's an old saying: "When in doubt, treat the bid as natural and forcing". Since the double takes out the force, and my hand is well described, I don't hesitate to pass.
0

#12 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-November-26, 03:39

"There's an old saying: "When in doubt, treat the bid as natural and forcing". Since the double takes out the force, and my hand is well described, I don't hesitate to pass."

The double does not take out the force in my book Ochinko, it offers you the alternative of making a slam try by passing. eg
4
AJ10754
Kxx
AKQ
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#13 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,444
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2008-November-26, 04:54

It just seems weird to me to assume that:

(1) When partner bids a suit, it actually shows support for some completely different suit.
(2) Passing is stronger than bidding and shows a slam try.

I'm not arguing with any of this stuff as an agreement. But this is a partner where you have not discussed this stuff at all, and you are making these assumptions?
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#14 User is offline   RichMor 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 279
  • Joined: 2008-July-15
  • Location:North Central US

Posted 2008-November-26, 07:17

The_Hog, on Nov 26 2008, 04:39 AM, said:

"There's an old saying: "When in doubt, treat the bid as natural and forcing". Since the double takes out the force, and my hand is well described, I don't hesitate to pass."

The double does not take out the force in my book Ochinko, it offers you the alternative of making a slam try by passing. eg
4
AJ10754
Kxx
AKQ

There is an alternate version that goes like this:

1. Undiscussed bids are assumed to be as natural as possible
2. In a constructive auction (we made the last bid) it is forcing
3. In a competetive auction (they made the last bid) it is non forcing

This version implies that 5 over the opps 4 is natural and non forcing. Of course we also add some common sense. Bidding a new suit at the 5 level doesn't make sense without some fit for partner's suit.

So I would take the 5 call as natural, non forcing, and showing Heart tolerance.
0

#15 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,346
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-November-26, 08:23

Quarky, on Nov 26 2008, 12:56 AM, said:

ALright, i bid 5H also, went for -3 dbled, found pard with

x
x
QJ10xxxx
Jxxx

He complained "do you want to play 6D?"

My first counter question would be: Why did you not open ?D ?

Regarding your original question: If you are unsure, what partners
5D bid means, you can pass 5D.
You should do this, if the bid was not Xed, but you can do it now
as well, although it is dangerous, because it is possible, that pass
showes diamonds tolerance.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#16 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-November-26, 09:42

I would never dream of passing 5 Diamond when they had not doubled and I doubt that passing is winning bridge.

For which hand do you expect a positive result from 5 Diamond from a passed hand with no heart fit?
This must be some lead directing stuff with a good heart fit.

With an unpassed partner and undisccussed it is far from clear what 5 Diamond should show, but in the given scenario....
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users