Question about a 2/1 sequence Balanced hands range
#1
Posted 2008-November-21, 07:18
1M 1NT
2NT
is used by many partnerships to show a balanced 18-19 HCP hand, reserving
1M 1NT
3NT
to show a solid 6-card Major suit with 16-18 HCP.
However, some people play the first sequence as showing a balanced hand with a strong no-trump range (which wasn't opened as 1NT because of the 5-card Major) and the second one for bal. 18-19 HCP. Is there any downside to playing this way? Is there a standard way of playing it? What does one way have over the other in terms of reaching bad contracts? Is the second version I described 'unplayable'?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2008-November-21, 08:13
Meaning of 1NT, is it forcing, semi-forcing, nonforcing?
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#3
Posted 2008-November-21, 08:15
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#4
Posted 2008-November-21, 09:07
- hrothgar
#5
Posted 2008-November-21, 09:55
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#6
Posted 2008-November-21, 12:01
Hanoi5, on Nov 21 2008, 10:55 AM, said:
Responder doesn't get to show his hand. What shows a limit raise? What if he is very weak with a long minor, or a little stronger? What if he has 5 hearts and doesn't know if opener has 3?
#7
Posted 2008-November-21, 12:04
Quote
Bidding 4 of the Major.
Quote
You'll have to define a little stronger, but if he's weak he can jolly well bid his minor being non-forcing.
Quote
As Hearts are very important let's say 3m after 2NT is sign off but not 3♥, which would show the 10-12 hand with at least 5 hearts.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#8
Posted 2008-November-21, 12:05
#9
Posted 2008-November-21, 12:08
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#10
Posted 2008-November-21, 12:11
Hanoi5, on Nov 21 2008, 09:55 AM, said:
How about
- you can't show the hand with a solid major and 16-18 in the style you suggest, and
- you might be too high with 15-17 opposite 6 hcp in 2NT?
Are these obvious enough?
#11
Posted 2008-November-21, 12:14
Hanoi5, on Nov 21 2008, 01:08 PM, said:
Why do I feel like this is going in circles a little.
You ask what are the downsides to playing a 3NT rebid is 18-19 balanced. Say the auction goes 1♠ 1NT 3NT.
- Responder can't show both a very weak hand with a minor, and a hand with a minor that might make game or slam.
- Responder can't search for a heart fit.
- Responder can't show a limit raise in spades abd a very weak raise where he meant to bid 1NT then 2♠.
And those are just problems over the 3NT rebid itself. Cherdano lists other obvious problems.
#12
Posted 2008-November-22, 13:44
What I have seen Richie Reisig training the juniors on BBO is that:
1m/1M - 1Any
3NT is describing a solid 6-card suit (minor or major) 18-19 pts.
Regards