I've seen a lot of ambiguous preemptive methods over a strong club, things like suction or psycho suction or DONT. Since everyone (or at least the regulators) seems to whine about how hard 2♥ non-forcing multi is to defend (in contrast to forcing methods like suction or naturalish methods like DONT), have people included this multi bid as part of their defense to a strong club? If so, what do you use the rest of the defensive overcalls for, to go well with this?
What about similar ideas that instead of 50-50 are 2-out-of-3? Something like
2♦ = 2 suits from clubs/diamonds/hearts
You are actually even more likely to be able to pass (than a 50-50 bid like multi) since now there's an a priori 2/3 chance that partner holds his suit bid.
Page 1 of 1
strong club defenses using 2H multi and similar ambiguous methods
#2
Posted 2008-August-29, 02:47
Just for fun we used to play this many years ago:
(1C) 2C = weak in next higher suit, or 5/5 with this suit and 2 above, or 4441 with a singleton in the bid suit.
Nowhere near as effective as canape overcalls, however.
(1C) 2C = weak in next higher suit, or 5/5 with this suit and 2 above, or 4441 with a singleton in the bid suit.
Nowhere near as effective as canape overcalls, however.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#3
Posted 2008-August-29, 03:15
The so-called HOLO / BOLO / ROLO / etc. interferences are popular among Dutch juniors. Some include a 2♥ overcall showing hearts or spades.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#4
Posted 2008-August-29, 04:42
The_Hog, on Aug 29 2008, 09:47 AM, said:
Just for fun we used to play this many years ago:
(1C) 2C = weak in next higher suit, or 5/5 with this suit and 2 above, or 4441 with a singleton in the bid suit.
Nowhere near as effective as canape overcalls, however.
(1C) 2C = weak in next higher suit, or 5/5 with this suit and 2 above, or 4441 with a singleton in the bid suit.
Nowhere near as effective as canape overcalls, however.
Just for fun we used to play this many years ago:
2-level jump overcalls = weak in the suit bid, or a 3-suiter short in the suit bid, or a specific 2-suiter not including the suit bid (I can't remember how you defined the 2 suits any more)
We still sometimes play 2-level jumps as either weak and natural or a 3-suiter excluding the suit, but we pick our opponents carefully.
#5
Posted 2008-August-29, 11:05
I like Amsbury JO to 1C-artificial:
WJO sits X;
1444 redoubles;
5-5 bids one of 2-known suits.
Add Paradox-like responses(pass/correct raises).
WJO sits X;
1444 redoubles;
5-5 bids one of 2-known suits.
Add Paradox-like responses(pass/correct raises).
Page 1 of 1