Page 1 of 1
Play 6S
#1
Posted 2008-August-08, 07:06
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
#2
Posted 2008-August-08, 12:56
Not quite sure what I'm missing. Can't I just play:
1. ruff
2. ♠A
3. ♠K (seeing if they are 4-1 onside), if so:
4a. Draw trumps, run clubs, take 12 tricks (if spades are 4-1 and clubs are 4-0, then I'm off).
4b. Draw trumps, play clubs and take the free diamond finesse.
1. ruff
2. ♠A
3. ♠K (seeing if they are 4-1 onside), if so:
4a. Draw trumps, run clubs, take 12 tricks (if spades are 4-1 and clubs are 4-0, then I'm off).
4b. Draw trumps, play clubs and take the free diamond finesse.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
#4
Posted 2008-August-09, 14:06
rogerclee, on Aug 8 2008, 06:20 PM, said:
If RHO drops the ♠9 on the A, I am taking the spade finesse.
Gaining if it's a singleton and the clubs break; losing against ♠J9(x).
♠A, K succeeds against 4-1 onside; ♠A, Q against either 4-1 if the ♦ finesse works. Seems like a tossup.
#5
Posted 2008-August-09, 14:52
I don't think it's a toss-up at all. Bidding 3♥ with a stiff Spade is very unlikely/unusual, albeit not impossible.
After testing Spades, if they're 3-2 you ruff a Diamond and make 7 (assuming 3-1 Clubs.) It is pairs, after all.
After testing Spades, if they're 3-2 you ruff a Diamond and make 7 (assuming 3-1 Clubs.) It is pairs, after all.
"Maybe we should all get together and buy Kaitlyn a box set of "All in the Family" for Chanukah. Archie didn't think he was a racist, the problem was with all the chinks, dagos, niggers, kikes, etc. ruining the country." ~ barmar
#6
Posted 2008-August-09, 17:25
You're right -- it's certainly not a tossup. I forgot that there was bidding. RHO can hardly have both a singleton spade and the diamond king, so ♠A,Q makes no sense.
#7
Posted 2008-August-12, 02:24
LHO held ♠J9xx ♥AKJxxx ♦xx ♣x
If you Cash the A and K of ♠s, RHO then shows out. If you then attack ♣s, LHO will ruff in on the 3rd round killing the entry to the ♣s.
I think the only way to make is to cash the AQ of ♠s. If the ♠s break the you can draw the last trump, cash ♣s and take a ♦ finesse for the 13th. On this deal, when they don't break and you need to attack ♣s and when LHO ruffs on the 3rd round, and exits a ♥ or whatever, you can draw trump and have to take the ♦ hook for the 12th trick.
If you Cash the A and K of ♠s, RHO then shows out. If you then attack ♣s, LHO will ruff in on the 3rd round killing the entry to the ♣s.
I think the only way to make is to cash the AQ of ♠s. If the ♠s break the you can draw the last trump, cash ♣s and take a ♦ finesse for the 13th. On this deal, when they don't break and you need to attack ♣s and when LHO ruffs on the 3rd round, and exits a ♥ or whatever, you can draw trump and have to take the ♦ hook for the 12th trick.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
#8
Posted 2008-August-12, 10:18
brianshark, on Aug 12 2008, 12:24 AM, said:
LHO held ♠J9xx ♥AKJxxx ♦xx ♣x
If you Cash the A and K of ♠s, RHO then shows out. If you then attack ♣s, LHO will ruff in on the 3rd round killing the entry to the ♣s.
I think the only way to make is to cash the AQ of ♠s. If the ♠s break the you can draw the last trump, cash ♣s and take a ♦ finesse for the 13th. On this deal, when they don't break and you need to attack ♣s and when LHO ruffs on the 3rd round, and exits a ♥ or whatever, you can draw trump and have to take the ♦ hook for the 12th trick.
If you Cash the A and K of ♠s, RHO then shows out. If you then attack ♣s, LHO will ruff in on the 3rd round killing the entry to the ♣s.
I think the only way to make is to cash the AQ of ♠s. If the ♠s break the you can draw the last trump, cash ♣s and take a ♦ finesse for the 13th. On this deal, when they don't break and you need to attack ♣s and when LHO ruffs on the 3rd round, and exits a ♥ or whatever, you can draw trump and have to take the ♦ hook for the 12th trick.
Not sure why I should divine to guard for LHO having 4 trumps when he is the overcaller. This is especially the case at MPs when if RHO has the 4 trumps, making the extra trick may be crucial.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
#9
Posted 2008-August-13, 03:57
Right. There was some discussion between me and a few guys who were trying to figure out the best line to safely make 6S (I don't think we need to play for an overtrick necessarily - it's an iffy slam, the field probably won't be in it, and if they are in slam, 6C is superior but 6S > 6C+1).
Both lines make if trumps are 3-2, but the AK line makes an easy overtrick. The AQ line works for either 4-1 break if the ♦K is onside. The AK line works independent of the ♦K's position but requires the 4-1 break to be onside.
The bidding suggests the AK line to be the better chance. I guess making this slam requires sub-optimal play after all.
Both lines make if trumps are 3-2, but the AK line makes an easy overtrick. The AQ line works for either 4-1 break if the ♦K is onside. The AK line works independent of the ♦K's position but requires the 4-1 break to be onside.
The bidding suggests the AK line to be the better chance. I guess making this slam requires sub-optimal play after all.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
Page 1 of 1
This is the first board of a 2-session Pairs competition.
Auction:
P - 1♠ - 2♥ - 3♣
3♥ - 4♥ - P - 4♠
P - 5♦ - P - 6♠
P - P - P
Lead: ♥A