BBO Discussion Forums: delayed splinter - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

delayed splinter

#1 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-August-06, 11:10

Scoring: IMP

1S - 2D
2S - 4C - (dbl)
4H - ??


Your call?
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-August-06, 11:15

Keycard? Partner obviously has good trumps so let's find out where we stand.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#3 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2008-August-06, 11:15

Very difficult to answer as this is an area where discussion with partner helps a lot.

I hate giving follow up questions, because likely the answer is going to be "no agreement", but the questions running through my mind are:

1. Why didn't partner pass and let me redouble with first round control or cue without it?

2. If partner has first round control, why didn't he redouble? If he doesn't, why was he so keen to show me his heart control?

Given partner doesn't have any fitting diamond honors and he wasn't interested in hearing if we had first round spade control, he probably has concentration in the majors. Maybe something like AKQxxx KQx xx xx?

I'm going to make a forward going move, but not really sure what's the best way. Guess I'll just keycard and bid slam if we're not off 2.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#4 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2008-August-06, 13:31

Are you asking if I'd jump to slam? Or just bid keycard first?
Kevin Fay
0

#5 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-August-06, 13:56

Jumping to slam would be poor as you are missing 2 aces. The 5-level was reasonably safe.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#6 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2008-August-06, 14:00

Yeah I know I'm just joking. Meaning: I'm bidding 4NT.
Kevin Fay
0

#7 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-August-06, 16:34

4♠. I've shown most of my hand. If partner has ♠AKQ and ♥KQ he should bid again; if his hearts were headed by the king only, I think he'd have passed the double of 4♣, planning to bid 4♥ on the next round. I hate going down at the five level.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-August-06, 16:56

gnasher, on Aug 6 2008, 05:34 PM, said:

4♠. I've shown most of my hand. If partner has ♠AKQ and ♥KQ he should bid again; if his hearts were headed by the king only, I think he'd have passed the double of 4♣, planning to bid 4♥ on the next round. I hate going down at the five level.

Partner doesn't need that hand.

Suppose that he has a maximum weak two in spades. Something like ♠AKQxx ♥x ♦xxx ♣xxx. That would fit with the control bid in hearts. Slam is a fairly good bet opposite that hand.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2008-August-06, 17:06

kenrexford, on Aug 6 2008, 02:56 PM, said:

Suppose that he has a maximum weak two in spades. Something like ♠AKQxx ♥x ♦xxx ♣xxx. That would fit with the control bid in hearts. Slam is a fairly good bet opposite that hand.

5=1=3=3s normally play a trick better than their counterparts.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#10 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-August-06, 17:36

Echognome, on Aug 6 2008, 06:06 PM, said:

kenrexford, on Aug 6 2008, 02:56 PM, said:

Suppose that he has a maximum weak two in spades.  Something like ♠AKQxx ♥x ♦xxx ♣xxx.  That would fit with the control bid in hearts.  Slam is a fairly good bet opposite that hand.

5=1=3=3s normally play a trick better than their counterparts.

See how strong my point is! Sure, if you give partner a sixth spade, the slam is easy to make. But this slam even makes when partner only has 12 cards because one of his spades is on the floor.

How bad is passing when partner makes slam with 12 cards?

LOL
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#11 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-August-06, 17:59

kenrexford, on Aug 6 2008, 06:36 PM, said:

Echognome, on Aug 6 2008, 06:06 PM, said:

kenrexford, on Aug 6 2008, 02:56 PM, said:

Suppose that he has a maximum weak two in spades.  Something like ♠AKQxx ♥x ♦xxx ♣xxx.  That would fit with the control bid in hearts.  Slam is a fairly good bet opposite that hand.

5=1=3=3s normally play a trick better than their counterparts.

See how strong my point is! Sure, if you give partner a sixth spade, the slam is easy to make. But this slam even makes when partner only has 12 cards because one of his spades is on the floor.

How bad is passing when partner makes slam with 12 cards?

LOL

True, passing partner in his 4-1 fit would not be good if he has 12 cards!
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#12 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-August-06, 18:05

That would be my typical result. Partner would think I introduced hearts late with a bad 6-4.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#13 User is offline   cnszsun 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 720
  • Joined: 2004-January-06
  • Location:CHINA

Posted 2008-August-06, 18:39

About whether to pass opponent's double of our cue-bid (here it's a splinter bid, maybe different), I once heard some agreements.
Similarly like this, redouble = first round control, pass = second round control, bid = no control. Anyone else ever heard of this?
Michael Sun

#14 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-August-06, 18:52

cnszsun, on Aug 6 2008, 07:39 PM, said:

About whether to pass opponent's double of our cue-bid (here it's a splinter bid, maybe different), I once heard some agreements.
Similarly like this, redouble = first round control, pass = second round control, bid = no control. Anyone else ever heard of this?

Yeah it's different over a splinter bid since there is no point to showing second round control.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#15 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2008-August-06, 19:04

cnszsun, on Aug 6 2008, 07:39 PM, said:

About whether to pass opponent's double of our cue-bid (here it's a splinter bid, maybe different), I once heard some agreements.
Similarly like this, redouble = first round control, pass = second round control, bid = no control. Anyone else ever heard of this?

Yes, I have played this (in cuebidding auctions).

Pass shows a holding where we won't lose the first 2 tricks.
This means second round control, or the queen of the suit.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#16 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2008-August-06, 23:37

I just bid 4S. Partner didnt redouble 4C so we got 1 club loser. Partner will need AKQ of spades or AKxxxxx to have slam significatly higher than 50%. With those holding and the K of H i expect him to keep going after 4S anyway.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#17 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-August-07, 01:14

I'm keycarding
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#18 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2008-August-07, 03:40

Is there any vote for 5♥ (♥A, dont worry about minors, how are your trumps?)?

Keycard will keep us out of slam if partner is missing the ♠A, but it will also keep us out of a decent slam if partner has ♠AQJxxxxx ♥Kx ♦x ♣xx.

Or is 5♥ an unlucky expert bid (or just plain wrong :P)?

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#19 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-August-07, 09:37

Trinidad, on Aug 7 2008, 04:40 AM, said:

Or is 5♥ an unlucky expert bid (or just plain wrong :P)?

First one. If partner had that hand he would have beaten us to keycard.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#20 User is offline   SoTired 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,016
  • Joined: 2005-June-20
  • Location:Lovettsville, VA

Posted 2008-August-07, 13:25

4H has to be forward going with no wasted club honors.

key-card for me. Why can't partner be ♠AKQxx ♥Kxx ...?
It costs nothing to be nice -- my better half
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

10 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users