5-5
#1
Posted 2008-May-22, 16:42
JT9xx
xxx
p-3♥-p-p
?
all vul, imps
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2008-May-22, 19:28
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#4
Posted 2008-May-22, 21:20
Jlall, on May 23 2008, 02:26 PM, said:
For which side?
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#5
Posted 2008-May-22, 21:32
Jlall, on May 22 2008, 09:26 PM, said:
I have to also think that odd's favor X.
#6 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-May-22, 21:55
Cascade, on May 22 2008, 10:20 PM, said:
Jlall, on May 23 2008, 02:26 PM, said:
For which side?
How can we be going for a big number very often? I mean it's possible RHO has a good hand with short hearts but then partner has very long hearts, and RHOs usually don't pass even with a good hand and 1 heart when their partner opens 3. Of course it's possible but I think it's like 10x as likely that we are getting them. Imagine partner made a penalty X of 3H, wouldn't you be licking your chops? I think that in this case partner has that pretty often, and if he doesn't he probably has a weak NT hand type and we should be ok then too if he bids something. I am only really worried about partner being weakish (like a 9 count) with 4 or 5 mediocre hearts and being endplayed into the pass.
#7
Posted 2008-May-22, 22:00
#8
Posted 2008-May-23, 00:36
Cascade, on May 22 2008, 10:20 PM, said:
Jlall, on May 23 2008, 02:26 PM, said:
For which side?
Ours for sure. Double.
#9
Posted 2008-May-23, 01:58
X is risking to enplayed partner into pass.
QJx
Qxxx
KQx
Axxx
3Hx making & 4S making.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#10
Posted 2008-May-23, 03:12
benlessard, on May 23 2008, 02:58 PM, said:
X is risking to enplayed partner into pass.
QJx
Qxxx
KQx
Axxx
3Hx making & 4S making.
Agree. Would bid 3S.
#11
Posted 2008-May-23, 03:32
Opener has an unbalanced hand and this hand is unbalanced too.
If partner is sort of balanced, than RHO is unbalanced and we should be prepared for some unpleasant surprises.
I pass.
#12
Posted 2008-May-23, 09:43
Then, I threw out all the hands where the 3H did not look right or would have been raised to 4H. Then I only kept the deals where I thought partner would pass our double. This last was usually quite clear.
This left 17 deals. On those hands 3H would probably be made 4 times, once with an overtrick. This is the overtrick hand:
I'll leave it to you to decide whether the 3H opening in second seat vulnerable is right and whether west would pass or raise to 4H.
On the other 13 hands 3H would be set 1, 2 or 3 tricks.
So on the hands where partner passes I'd say you come out a bit ahead.
However, on the hands where partner pulls you come out ahead a lot, you almost always land in a good contract either in clubs, diamonds and spades.
I think double is a clear winner.
- hrothgar
#13 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-May-23, 09:59
han, on May 23 2008, 10:43 AM, said:
On 20 of those hands I judged that partner would pass the double, and on 7 of those hands 3HX would probably be made, 2 times with at least 1 overtrick. On the other 13 deals we probably beat them 1, 2 or 3 tricks. It seems that when partner passes we are slightly behind.
However, on the 40 hands where partner pulls we are well ahead, this almost always leads to good contracts, either in spades, diamonds or clubs.
I think double is a clear winner over pass or 3S.
Well I am sceptical since so far you have given me some examples of 3H openers as x KQT9xxx Axx xx and --- AQJTxxx xx JT8x heh.
It seems wrong to me that they are making overtricks on hands where partner has PASSED the double. I mean how could they not have bid 4H already if they make when one person is passing a t/o X which implies their trumps don't split very well. Imagine how many they'd make if trumps did split!
#14
Posted 2008-May-23, 10:15
I made some blatant mistakes the first time. For example, once west had: 10xxx A AK AKQ108x. Believe it or not, that was one of the hands where 3HX made with overtricks .
- hrothgar
#15
Posted 2008-May-23, 10:27
benlessard, on May 23 2008, 02:58 AM, said:
X is risking to enplayed partner into pass.
QJx
Qxxx
KQx
Ax xx
3Hx making & 4S making.
Not sure how you think 3H is making if partner holds that hand. Sure its possible, but its also unlikely.
In the meantime, Double.
Support for all other suits, and if partner has a penalty double of 3H, wonderful.
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#16
Posted 2008-May-23, 10:41
han, on May 23 2008, 11:15 AM, said:
I made some blatant mistakes the first time. For example, once west had: 10xxx A AK AKQ108x. Believe it or not, that was one of the hands where 3HX made with overtricks .
On the overtrick example in your big post we go for 500 or 800 in 3♠ anyway. I think you have clearly shown double is a winner.
It actually taught me something. I didn't think it would be nearly as obvious as it turned out to be, even though I did double.
#17
Posted 2008-May-23, 12:21
#18
Posted 2008-May-25, 02:09
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#19
Posted 2008-May-25, 09:34
benlessard, on May 25 2008, 12:09 AM, said:
I'm sure there is. That doesn't mean that double isn't both the call that wins most frequently or the call that gets the greatest number of imps long term.
#20
Posted 2008-May-26, 02:29
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."