You're winning this match by 8 imp's with 7 boards to go.
How would you open? What's your bid?
#1
Posted 2008-May-15, 07:58
You're winning this match by 8 imp's with 7 boards to go.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2008-May-15, 08:09
#3
Posted 2008-May-15, 08:15
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#4
Posted 2008-May-15, 08:18
The_Hog, on May 15 2008, 09:09 AM, said:
I think I'm a trick shy of 5♣. Maybe a trick and a half...if partner is void in clubs, I'm likely to have two club losers if I don't guess right.
#5
Posted 2008-May-15, 08:35
Answer: 5
Conclusion: I would like to open 4♣, so I'm going to vote for that, knowing that I sometimes would like to play 3NT but I failed to agree with partner that 3NT shows a 4m-opening with a non-solid suit.
#6
Posted 2008-May-15, 08:52
#7
Posted 2008-May-15, 09:20
This is not a bad hand.
If necessary, I can bid a lot of clubs later. I do not want to preempt my partner and force him to guess at the 5 level.
I also do not want to rule out 3NT as a possible contract. It is very difficult to get to 3NT if you open the bidding 4♣ or 5♣. I know that I am dreaming, but 3NT is cold opposite as little as xxxx QJx QJxx Ax, and there are many slightly better hands which make 3NT easy.
#8
Posted 2008-May-15, 09:24
George Carlin
#10
Posted 2008-May-15, 09:33
1♣. Don't preempt yourself out of 3N.
#11
Posted 2008-May-15, 09:39
4 ♣ is acceptable, but I'd prefer to just get the hand off my chest in one bid. One ♣ just makes it too easy on opp's.
#12
Posted 2008-May-15, 10:18
#13
Posted 2008-May-15, 10:57
And of course we might find 3NT, though a missed 3NT would not be my main objection against opening 4♣( I think it is very closed, and actually voted 4♣ but changed my mind before making this post.)
#14
Posted 2008-May-16, 13:06
#15
Posted 2008-May-16, 13:17
I don't like a red 5♣ with only 8 tricks as is too easy to X
#16
Posted 2008-May-16, 13:57
It seems that if you bid 1♣, your problems are not really over. Say partner responses with 1M. Now this hand seems a bit too good (offensively) for 2♣, which partner could easily pass on a pretty decent hand with short clubs, but at the same time it is wrong for 3♣ which could easily convince partner to bid a no-play 3NT.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#17
Posted 2008-May-16, 13:59
awm, on May 16 2008, 11:57 AM, said:
It seems that if you bid 1♣, your problems are not really over. Say partner responses with 1M. Now this hand seems a bit too good (offensively) for 2♣, which partner could easily pass on a pretty decent hand with short clubs, but at the same time it is wrong for 3♣ which could easily convince partner to bid a no-play 3NT.
If partner bid 1 major, I think most of us would bid 2♣ and hope to catch up. 3♣ is really weird with this hand.
#19
Posted 2008-May-16, 20:34
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#20
Posted 2008-May-17, 03:07
1C.
It is either 1C or 4C, ask me tomorow.
The adv. of 4C is, I will be done with the hand,
the disadv., partner wont give me the Ace of
spades.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)