BBO Discussion Forums: trump management - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

trump management

#1 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,176
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2008-February-29, 10:58

Scoring: IMP

RHO passes, and, playing a weak notrump style, you open 1. Partner bids 1N, forcing and an artificial 2 over your 2. 2 is a puppet to 2, either weak, as here, or various hand-types. I mention this because RHO doubles 2. The opening lead is the A followed by the Q, which RHO overtakes to lead the J. You ruff with the 7 and cash the top trump. Both opps follow low. How do you continue, and why. Experts/advanced, hide answers please


I meant they followed to the Ace of trump.... sorry to be unclear, but they couldn't both have followed low to two rounds of trump ;) Edited
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#2 User is offline   vuroth 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,459
  • Joined: 2007-June-03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-February-29, 11:20

By top trump, you mean they followed suit to the A, or to the AK?
Still decidedly intermediate - don't take my guesses as authoritative.

"gwnn" said:

rule number 1 in efficient forum reading:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
0

#3 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-February-29, 11:27

Ah, I misread. Now the problem makes more sense too!
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#4 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,176
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2008-February-29, 11:39

I have edited the problem to specify they followed low to one round of trump, and it is at that point that you are asked to explain your next play
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#5 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-February-29, 12:47

Nice instructive problem where the safety play cannot lose a trick, thus being the correct play at any scoring.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#6 User is offline   vuroth 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,459
  • Joined: 2007-June-03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-February-29, 14:26

We've lost 2. We will lose 1, 1 and 1 for certain. There may be a second loser if are 4-1 and neither honour is isolated.

If are 3-2, there's a danger in having the short suit ruff a black card, creating a second trump loser we never had. Spades 5-2 or Clubs 4-2 are possible.

Playing the K loses immediately on the 4-1 trump splits, unless an honour falls.

I'll play low to the 10. This costs me nothing. If both follow, I make. If LHO shows out, the finesse is marked, and I still have the Ato get to the board to do it.

If RHO shows out, well yuck. I'll try to run out the black cards, spades then clubs, and hope that LHO ends up on lead with Qx against my K9.

V
Still decidedly intermediate - don't take my guesses as authoritative.

"gwnn" said:

rule number 1 in efficient forum reading:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
0

#7 User is offline   frouu 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 90
  • Joined: 2007-January-13

Posted 2008-March-03, 12:03

I don't think know if I'm right but here's my thought.
assuming 4-3 spades and 4-2 or 3-3 clubs , I think this hand is about counting winners. our goal is to win 4 hearts 2 clubs 2 spades, so don't touch trumps, just drive out ace of spades, none of the opps can play diamonds (ruff and sluff), if RHO wins ace and plays small trump, play 9 of hearts, you're guaranteed for 4th heart trick. assume plays spade or club, finish spades then clubs, and if LHO wins third club, he is endplayed, why? , at this point we're at 11th trick, and we have 3 trumps (K97) we have won 6 tricks ( diamond ruff , heart ace, 2 spades 2 clubs) , we'll certainly get one with K, now if LHO has 3 hearts (started with 4), he'll have to waste Q or J, otherwise we'll win with 10 at dummy. if RHO has 3 hearts left, he'll have to waste one of his J or Q to whatever LHO returns, if hearts are 2-1 , no problem, if RHO wins last club, we'll play small heart to whatever he leads, if LHO wins with J or Q of hearts, he's endplayed again. This way caters to 4-1 trump distributions.

if spades are 5-2, this way may lose a spade trick since we didnt pull trumps. in that case we need to hope 3-2 hearts with 3 with short spade.
0

#8 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2008-March-04, 07:21

skaeran, on Feb 29 2008, 07:47 PM, said:

Nice instructive problem where the safety play cannot lose a trick, thus being the correct play at any scoring.

Hidden text follows:
Spoiler


Here's another question for you: why were we right to ruff the third round of diamonds in hand rather than discarding a club on it?
0

#9 User is offline   y66 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,496
  • Joined: 2006-February-24

Posted 2008-March-06, 08:05

Like vuroth's line. Thanks for the problem.

re: FH's question, why were we right to ruff the third round of diamonds in hand rather than discarding a club on it?

I don't think it can ever cost to ruff the 3rd diamond.

If LHO has an honor and 1, 2 or 3 small hearts, we don't mind if he over-ruffs the 3rd diamond. We were going to lose a heart anyway.

If LHO has QJx of hearts, we'll lose 2 hearts if RHO has SA and 1 heart if LHO has SA, no matter what we play (if we pitch a club, RHO will continue diamonds).

If LHO has QJxx of hearts, we'll lose 2 hearts no matter what we play.
If you lose all hope, you can always find it again -- Richard Ford in The Sportswriter
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users