BBO Discussion Forums: Worth of inviting? and what if yes? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Worth of inviting? and what if yes?

#1 User is offline   cnszsun 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 720
  • Joined: 2004-January-06
  • Location:CHINA

Posted 2008-January-19, 07:21

Scoring: IMP

ps-1
1-2
?

Opps silent, I passed at 1st seat, and parter opened 1, i responded 1 (2 better?).
Anyway, after partner rebid 2, what to call?
Michael Sun

#2 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-January-19, 07:57

It's imps. I gotta invite, so 3. I'll probably go down if pard has a lousy min, but I can't pass this and miss a game if pard has a good min.
0

#3 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2008-January-19, 09:31

This is the kind of hand where you consider not inviting, but if don't you will feel very silly that you didn't as partner quickly claims overtricks.

Quote

I'll probably go down


You mean partner will go down.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#4 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-January-19, 10:45

I hate inviting when partner can't judge because we bid our xxxx suit. I'm not saying I hate the 1 bid, just that inviting is pointless because partner can't judge correctly, even though I think on values it's worth an invite. So I'll guess pass instead of 4.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#5 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2008-January-19, 17:19

Assuming that 2 by me would have been natural, I would have bid 2 in response to 1.

Either way, I raise to 3 now.
0

#6 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,206
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-January-20, 15:06

Hi,

3H.

I would have prefered a 2D bid, but it turned out,
that 2H worked better.
I have 3 tricks for partner, so he should make 3H
with a min. opener, and he may well have something
to spare.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#7 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-January-20, 16:59

I'll invite, knowing full well that partner may evaluate his spade KJx as "bonus". Anything else just seems worse to me.
0

#8 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-January-21, 04:08

As a passed hand I must at least invite opposite a 6 card suit, so 3 Heart is it.

And I disagree that this hand is strong enough for 2 Diamond, planing to rebid spades later.

F.E.: Pd has AKxx, AKxxx,xxxx,x and bids what opposite 2 from a passed partner? If you are not strong enough to open, you are hardly strong enough to reverse now.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#9 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-January-21, 05:05

Playing 2/1 this is clearly not a 2D bid. The S are miserable also and I might have started with a fnt. However, 3H is clear now.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#10 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-January-21, 05:31

The_Hog, on Jan 21 2008, 06:05 AM, said:

Playing 2/1 this is clearly not a 2D bid. The S are miserable also and I might have started with a fnt. However, 3H is clear now.

You are a passed hand.
0

#11 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2008-January-21, 05:36

FWIW, I would have bid 2 on the previous round.

As it is, I'm leaning towards 4 but I'm scared pard might be forced in s if the opps find that lead (or switch). I agree with Josh about the fact that your spades are crap that pard can't properly evaluate his hand. But also, if we jump to game quickly, opps might lead a minor which will probably work out nicely for us. I also gave a jump to 3N some thought. It's more of a gamble so maybe I shouldn't, but I like the idea of keeping opps in the dark about my hand. While a spade lead through responder's suit occurs now and then, rarely will they lead into it. Hearts could easily run and if pard has only 5 s then chances are good he has 4 s.

Mark me down for a 3NT gamble.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#12 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-January-21, 06:06

brianshark, on Jan 21 2008, 08:36 PM, said:

if pard has only 5 s then chances are good he has 4 s.
.

Not possible after this bidding. If he has 5332 he will rebid NT and with 5/4 his suit.
So he promised 6+ Hearts.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#13 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2008-January-21, 08:19

Right you are. 4 it is.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#14 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-January-21, 11:05

jdonn, on Jan 19 2008, 06:45 PM, said:

I hate inviting when partner can't judge because we bid our xxxx suit. I'm not saying I hate the 1 bid, just that inviting is pointless because partner can't judge correctly, even though I think on values it's worth an invite. So I'll guess pass instead of 4.

Very good point. But at the table I'd surely bid 4 :)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#15 User is offline   junyi_zhu 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 536
  • Joined: 2003-May-28
  • Location:Saltlake City

Posted 2008-January-21, 15:23

cnszsun, on Jan 19 2008, 01:21 PM, said:

Scoring: IMP

ps-1
1-2
?

Opps silent, I passed at 1st seat, and parter opened 1, i responded 1 (2 better?).
Anyway, after partner rebid 2, what to call?

This is a clear 3H bid, your overall strength justifies the invitation. HQJ can be very good,
DKQJ, CQ can have some value. 4H is a clear overbid because of the poor control. Pass is just way too chicken.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users