hand
#2
Posted 2007-November-16, 14:13
#3
Posted 2007-November-16, 14:17
#4
Posted 2007-November-16, 14:35
#5
Posted 2007-November-16, 15:10
Kudos to Helene for actually going beyond double to explain her plan.
I would be very worried that partner won't read 4♠ as choice of games. If we held, for example, Axx Kx QJxx AJxx, we'd be trying for slam, and we might well want to try via 4♠.. picturing x Axxx A10xx KQxx as not unreasonable. And we can't use keycard because a 2 keycard response would get us beyond our safety level.
Anyway, I'm taking the coward's way out by doubling and I'm not saying what I'll do if/when he bids 4♣... maybe I won't have to.
#6
Posted 2007-November-16, 15:20
#7
Posted 2007-November-16, 15:32
#8
Posted 2007-November-16, 15:55
The thing is, I've seen a lot of polls where the auction goes 1♠-X-3♠-X-Pass and we have the takeout doubler's hand. It seems like people often vote for pass when we have 1444 shape and reasonable defense, on the reasoning that "partner's double is usually 3244, we have only 8-card fits so if we make at the four-level they are down two at the three-level" or people saying "we will often get +200 on hands where we may not have a game" or such things.
I am sure that double is a good blame transfer, in that if partner passes and it's wrong we can always say "bad partner, why did you pass instead of bidding" whereas if partner bids and it's wrong we can say "bad partner, why didn't you pass the double and take our plus" but I don't realistically think that partner has any way to go right.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#9
Posted 2007-November-16, 15:56
- hrothgar
#10
Posted 2007-November-16, 17:16
#11 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-November-16, 20:16
#12
Posted 2007-November-16, 20:50
#13 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-November-16, 21:01
jdonn, on Nov 16 2007, 09:50 PM, said:
I think the reverse is way more likely, but obviously 3N is more likely to go down than 3N as well.
#14
Posted 2007-November-16, 21:51
.. neilkaz ..
#15
Posted 2007-November-16, 22:08
Jlall, on Nov 16 2007, 10:01 PM, said:
jdonn, on Nov 16 2007, 09:50 PM, said:
I think the reverse is way more likely, but obviously 3N is more likely to go down than 3N as well.
I don't really think so with spades just stopped once. There are lots of hands for partner where you have the spade ace, 8 tricks in two of your suits, and off the ace of your third suit, but partner has a stiff spade (or you get to pitch one from hand) so the missing ace is your only loser in diamonds. This seems like a very real possiblity to me and is actually what tilts me toward double in the end.
#16
Posted 2007-November-16, 22:16
#17
Posted 2007-November-16, 23:02
- hrothgar
#18 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-November-17, 01:31
Apollo81, on Nov 16 2007, 11:16 PM, said:
Yes of course (though i'm not a doubler).
#19
Posted 2007-November-17, 02:13
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#20
Posted 2007-November-17, 09:49
The only question for me is D-xfer 1st, then S-cue. I fear that over-emphasizes my diamonds.
Either xfer lets partner progress not fearing controls shortage.