Only 2 hands for now:
love all, MP's
Axxx
xx
xx
JT9xx
1♦-4♦-p-4♠
p-p-5♦-?
and a really cute one:
MP's
N (dealer)
Axx
x
void
AKJT98xxx
opposite
S
xx
AKTxx
AQT9xx
void
W will bid 1♠ if given the chance, but that's all the intervention you'll get in this board.
I know "these are not the hands your system should be geared for". Still, for general theoretical interest, what would your sequence be in your favorite system?
Page 1 of 1
junior champs
#1
Posted 2007-September-15, 17:58
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2007-September-15, 18:17
1. 5♠ (I assume 4♦ was a 65+ majors)
2. Hum.. dunno. Will probably end up in 5♣ after N bidding those a couple times.
2. Hum.. dunno. Will probably end up in 5♣ after N bidding those a couple times.
#3
Posted 2007-September-15, 18:27
oh and a play problem
IMP's
you open 2NT and pd signs off in 3NT, lho leads what looks like 4th club from 5 and dummy tables:
Txx
Axx
J9xxx
9x
your hand:
AKx
QJ9x
AQx
AJx
You put in the 9 and RHO covers with the Queen.
IMP's
you open 2NT and pd signs off in 3NT, lho leads what looks like 4th club from 5 and dummy tables:
Txx
Axx
J9xxx
9x
your hand:
AKx
QJ9x
AQx
AJx
You put in the 9 and RHO covers with the Queen.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2007-September-16, 15:58
Duck 2 clubs and cash ♦A
1♦-4♦ is a bid I never seen yet, has o be something special and I bid 5♠.
the other hand starts
1♣-1♥- (1♠)
and now I have no clue, I was willing to fake a ♠ reverse, this means I have to pass 1♠!, I dunno if I would had the guts.
1♣-1♥- (1♠)
pass-X
4♣-5♣
6♣
All the bids after 1♠ are highly debatable, I ain't so sure of any of all except last pass.
1♦-4♦ is a bid I never seen yet, has o be something special and I bid 5♠.
the other hand starts
1♣-1♥- (1♠)
and now I have no clue, I was willing to fake a ♠ reverse, this means I have to pass 1♠!, I dunno if I would had the guts.
1♣-1♥- (1♠)
pass-X
4♣-5♣
6♣
All the bids after 1♠ are highly debatable, I ain't so sure of any of all except last pass.
#5
Posted 2007-September-17, 11:50
On hand #1, I find the 4♦ bid to be extremely strange. Without prior agreement, I would interpret it as preemptive with diamonds.
I always play 1 of a minor - 3 of a minor as preemptive, so I don't see why 4 wouldn't be preemptive.
There are plently of other ways to show the majors - double, Michaels cue bid, bid both suits. Why should 4♦ be for the majors?
I always play 1 of a minor - 3 of a minor as preemptive, so I don't see why 4 wouldn't be preemptive.
There are plently of other ways to show the majors - double, Michaels cue bid, bid both suits. Why should 4♦ be for the majors?
#6
Posted 2007-September-19, 17:02
1. 4♦ is some kind of super michaels? I think this is the type of hand I can take the push on. If pard has some sort of super 5=6=1=1, it wouldn't surprise me to make 5♠, and be able to set 5♦ only 1.
2. I don't know what I'd do with the North hand. It probably changes day to day. I guess I'd end up in 6C and not be happy with the result.
3. Play Problem - Its going to be difficult to keep RHO off lead. I'll probably duck the 1st two clubs and play A-Q diamonds hoping for 2s's, 2h's 4d's and 1c losing 2C's, 1h and 1d along the way.
2. I don't know what I'd do with the North hand. It probably changes day to day. I guess I'd end up in 6C and not be happy with the result.
3. Play Problem - Its going to be difficult to keep RHO off lead. I'll probably duck the 1st two clubs and play A-Q diamonds hoping for 2s's, 2h's 4d's and 1c losing 2C's, 1h and 1d along the way.
"Phil" on BBO
Page 1 of 1