BBO Discussion Forums: Which bid? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Which bid? Matchpoint.

Poll: Which bid lead to the disaster? (7 member(s) have cast votes)

Which bid lead to the disaster?

  1. 2 Spades (4 votes [57.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.14%

  2. 3 Spades (3 votes [42.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.86%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Helmer 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 52
  • Joined: 2006-January-07

Posted 2007-August-07, 08:11

Scoring: MP


PASS - 1   - 2    - 3
3    - 3 NT  - 4   - 5
PASS - PASS - 5    - DBL -
ALL PASS

Which bid lead to the disaster - was it th 2 , or was it the support from south?

I deleted the 2 further bids 4 and 5 as options.

Please give your comment.

Thanks

Result 800 - topplayed KQ in Spades so AJx gave 2 tricks.
0

#2 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,497
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2007-August-07, 08:18

All of the bidding was atrocious. Lets leave it at that.

On the one hand, the 2 bidder preempted way too low to start with then took two free bids later in the auction. If North beleives that his hand is worth competing to the five level, then he damn sure shouldn't make a 2 weak jump overcall. When you are preempting, you (typically) chose the level that you are willing to compete to and then make that bid. Walking the Dog lets the opponents exchange information is is begging for them to double you when its right for them and compete effectively when it isn't.

I'm not fond of South's raise to 3 with xx in support and a defensive trick. The best I can say is that this bid seems consistant with North's underbid.
Alderaan delenda est
0

#3 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2007-August-07, 08:23

Of all of the bids taken by North-South in this auction, only one makes any sense at all. The 2S bid by North was remotely rational. There are many players who choose not to preempt to the usual level indicated by the length of their long suit when they have 7222 distribution. Also, the preempt might cause South to sacrifice on the wrong hand - the North hand, with an Ace, has some defense.

Having said that, at favorable vulnerability with a good suit, I would always bid 3S on the North hand.

The raise to 3S by South and the further bids by North are so awful that I may lose my breakfast.
0

#4 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2007-August-07, 08:41

At this vulnerability, I would bid 4 initially and be done with it. I expect to be minus two (or three) vs. 4H/5m making on most hands.
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#5 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-August-07, 08:59

Agree with the others. I'm not going to pick one of the two because that would be too kind to any of the other bids by NS.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#6 User is offline   ralph23 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 701
  • Joined: 2007-July-11

Posted 2007-August-07, 09:14

North didn't preempt enough with a passed-hand-partner. I'd bid 3 at least. And probably 4, depending on what I'd had for lunch. I can take either 6 or 7 tricks in my own hand if are trump (depending on the Jack of trump), and at these colors overbidding by 4 tricks is fine.

If West dealt and opened then p isn't a passed hand, and I'm just overcalling 1 on the North hand.

The remainder of the bids by NS are too awful to comment on. North in particular violated Bill Root's Cardinal Rule of Pre-Empts, and did it twice: Pre-empt as high as you dare, and then shut up, unless partner forces you or invites you to take action.

South's raise wasn't good, to be sure, but if North had followed the Cardinal Rule, it would not have led to so much mischief.
Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that other philosophers are all jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself. H.L. Mencken.
0

#7 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-August-07, 09:38

I don't object much to the 3 bid. It's a 'table feel' bid, and a pretty safe one at that. After all, it's not like your partner's going to bid again, right? I might bid 3 if LHO looks really excited, or RHO bid 3 quickly over the jump. Or I might not.
0

#8 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-August-07, 09:43

perfect auction, very unlucky result.
0

#9 User is offline   zasanya 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: 2003-December-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thane,Mumbai,Maharashtra,India
  • Interests:Chess,Scrabble,Bridge

Posted 2007-August-07, 10:06

Helmer, on Aug 7 2007, 09:11 AM, said:

Result 800 - topplayed KQ in Spades so AJx gave 2 tricks.

Is the result all that awful? -800 against -620 or -650.Could have been -500?Happens all the time but N should have bid 4 to begin with.
Aniruddha
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
0

#10 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2007-August-07, 11:05

zasanya, on Aug 7 2007, 11:06 AM, said:

Helmer, on Aug 7 2007, 09:11 AM, said:

Result 800 - topplayed KQ in Spades so AJx gave 2 tricks.

Is the result all that awful? -800 against -620 or -650.Could have been -500?Happens all the time but N should have bid 4 to begin with.

At Matchpoints, it's a likely zero.
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#11 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-August-07, 12:43

This is really funny, the auction is so terrible, but the only reason they got a bottom instead of an excellent score is that declarer didn't take the spade finesse against the Jack that seems obvious on the bidding.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#12 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-August-07, 13:49

I don't like the bidding.

My comments:

2 = very, very conservative at these colors. 3 is fine and I don't mind 1

3 = I know my pard is "very, very conservative at these colors", so I'm allowed to raise on anything. Thats why we are a great team.

4 = Hey, what do you know - I have a 7 card suit and pard raised? Lets push the pot a little.

5 = So, pard can't double 5x? 5 has to be a good sac.
"Phil" on BBO
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users