jtfanclub, on Jun 28 2007, 01:05 AM, said:
I've given up on books on bidding. They seem to contradict each other, and I have trouble keeping them straight. Maybe if I just read one author 14 times it would sink in.
So I mostly come over here, where people are generally kind enough to set me straight when I bring up one of my many stupid misconceptions, and/or explain when I ask why some bid would be crazy. I have, thank God, not annoyed them enough for them to kick me out.
So I mostly come over here, where people are generally kind enough to set me straight when I bring up one of my many stupid misconceptions, and/or explain when I ask why some bid would be crazy. I have, thank God, not annoyed them enough for them to kick me out.
That's wonderful (no sarcasm) if you play at a club with some really knowledgeable players.
Often the problem is that if one is not a bidding theory expert oneself it is very hard to distinguish the real expert advice from the fake expert advice. And even players who know about bidding theory may be prone to biasing the advice they give directly after a board:
- Resulting: the result was bad so our bidding must have been bad
- Pride: something went wrong and I can't accept it was my fault so it must be partner's.
- Sympathy/empathy: This player is an asshole so it is probably his fault.
So yes, reading the same book 14 times (well maybe slightly few), or reading 14 books by the same author, will help. If you make a selection of 14 books by Bergen (or Lawrence if you prefer) you should have reasonable coverage.