[jillybean]

skaeran, on Jul 1 2007, 01:32 PM, said:

The reason I'd GF vs a BI is that then I would be playing a very plain and simple system, where we would be sure to have a fit. Besides, I'd assume that BI would be playing fairly sound openings , a good 12 and upwards.

Dont assume a good 12 if I ever sit opposite you

skaeran, on Jul 1 2007, 01:32 PM, said:

Whatever faults there might be to my character, arrogance is not among them.

Ok my apologies, I misunderstood the tone of your post.

[skjaeran]

jillybean2, on Jul 2 2007, 08:13 AM, said:

skaeran, on Jul 1 2007, 01:32 PM, said:

The reason I'd GF vs a BI is that then I would be playing a very plain and simple system, where we would be sure to have a fit. Besides, I'd assume that BI would be playing fairly sound openings , a good 12 and upwards.

Dont assume a good 12 if I ever sit opposite you

skaeran, on Jul 1 2007, 01:32 PM, said:

Whatever faults there might be to my character, arrogance is not among them.

Ok my apologies, I misunderstood the tone of your post.

No problem Jilly

Be sure, if you were opposite, I'd just invite game, since I know you like opening light. Playing with Foo or other extremely sound openers, I'd go looking for slam...