Page 1 of 1
Never heard this one before
#1
Posted 2007-June-03, 18:34
Imps
(3D)=3NT=P=P
(4D)=X=P=P
P
I do not remember reading or hearing about this lead type before.
Assume you lead A from AK.
Partner leads the K of hearts and QJX of hearts shows up in dummy.
I guessed the K of hearts meant something but was not sure what.
Partner shifts to the 5 of spades at trick two.
Later he told me that this showed a stiff in the suit he lead at trick two.
(3D)=3NT=P=P
(4D)=X=P=P
P
I do not remember reading or hearing about this lead type before.
Assume you lead A from AK.
Partner leads the K of hearts and QJX of hearts shows up in dummy.
I guessed the K of hearts meant something but was not sure what.
Partner shifts to the 5 of spades at trick two.
Later he told me that this showed a stiff in the suit he lead at trick two.
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-June-03, 18:41
mike777, on Jun 3 2007, 07:34 PM, said:
Later he told me that this showed a stiff in the suit he lead at trick two.
thats correct.
#4
Posted 2007-June-03, 20:42
dake50, on Jun 3 2007, 08:40 PM, said:
A stiff after a natural 3NT????
Shocking isn't it? If you look at the other thread, you will even find a stiff in a natural 1NT overcall!!!
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#5
Posted 2007-June-04, 09:41
So leading your top honors in reverse order and then shifting shows a stiff?
#6
Posted 2007-June-04, 10:01
Justin,
Is this only after a penalty double when the opening leader originally bid some number of NT?
Is this only after a penalty double when the opening leader originally bid some number of NT?
#7
Posted 2007-June-04, 10:41
The King lead is not always readable. If the Queen is in dummy, or in partner's hand, its obvious.
A few weeks ago, I led a K from AKxxxx with a side void. The auction made my hand kind of obvious, but this woke up the sleepiest of partners who gave me two ruffs.
A few weeks ago, I led a K from AKxxxx with a side void. The auction made my hand kind of obvious, but this woke up the sleepiest of partners who gave me two ruffs.
"Phil" on BBO
#8
Posted 2007-June-04, 10:46
goobers, on Jun 4 2007, 09:41 AM, said:
So leading your top honors in reverse order and then shifting shows a stiff?
No this is only with AK. If you have KQ you can't afford to lead that, you have to start your single immediately to work on the ruffs, but if you lead from AK you expect to win the trick and you can shift to your singleton.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#9 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-June-04, 11:15
ArcLight, on Jun 4 2007, 11:01 AM, said:
Justin,
Is this only after a penalty double when the opening leader originally bid some number of NT?
Is this only after a penalty double when the opening leader originally bid some number of NT?
No it's just if you lead the "wrong" card from AK you either
A) have AK doubleton or
are going to shift to a singleton.
Page 1 of 1