Your Bid?
#21
Posted 2007-June-01, 04:28
1♦ 1♠ pass 2♥
3♣ 3♥ 5♦
now I can probably bid 6♥ because pard is likely to have a singleton diamond.
#22
Posted 2007-June-01, 05:29
This seems the most descriptive first bid, and I hope that later in the auction partner will realise I'm not doing blackwood of some sort because I've got the spade cards.
#23
Posted 2007-June-01, 06:01
#24
Posted 2007-June-01, 06:52
I think the correct way is to bid arend's plan.
#25
Posted 2007-June-01, 09:17
My second choice would be 4♣ splinter, but partner is almost surely going to sign off over this even with a diamond control since he will have bad trumps and probably not a whole lot of extras. Then I'll be guessing at the 5-level anyway.
edit: arend's plan sounds fine too
#26
Posted 2007-June-01, 11:53
Walddk, on Jun 1 2007, 10:31 AM, said:
Jlall, on Jun 1 2007, 05:57 AM, said:
ditto. 3♥ followed by 4♣ if partner signs off. If he rebids 4♠, then 5♣ next.
Roland
Same for me.
Harald
#27
Posted 2007-June-01, 12:04
Walddk, on Jun 1 2007, 12:31 AM, said:
Jlall, on Jun 1 2007, 05:57 AM, said:
ditto. 3♥ followed by 4♣ if partner signs off. If he rebids 4♠, then 5♣ next.
Roland
If youre going to commit this hand to the 5 level, I like a direct 5♠. I'm willing to give up after:
1♠ - 3♥
3♠ - 4♣
4♠...
#28 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-June-01, 12:21
pclayton, on Jun 1 2007, 01:04 PM, said:
Walddk, on Jun 1 2007, 12:31 AM, said:
Jlall, on Jun 1 2007, 05:57 AM, said:
ditto. 3♥ followed by 4♣ if partner signs off. If he rebids 4♠, then 5♣ next.
Roland
If youre going to commit this hand to the 5 level, I like a direct 5♠.
Why? 5S will demand partner to bid 6 with a diamond control, given that I don't have solid hearts I don't want to do that. I'd much rather get the heart king into play as well.
Besides I have a sneaking suspicion that if someone were to post a hand like Qxxxxxx --- xxxx xx a lot of the forum regulars would bid something like 5S (not that I would, but I've noticed a huge tendency here to jump to the 5 level with a preemptive hand, including 5M openers). Of course I'm sure no one will admit to this but these "clear cut" bids aren't always so clear cut to partner
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0731/f07315330c72d721a433df91b1dcf64ddc348248" alt=";)"
#29
Posted 2007-June-02, 00:24
inquiry, on Jun 1 2007, 12:52 PM, said:
I bid 2♦ first just because on competitive direct 5♠ could be taken as preemptive, but actually when RHO has passed this is not an option.