BBO Discussion Forums: Continuation of 1H negative - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Continuation of 1H negative How to bid on in strong 1D system?

#1 User is offline   ppek 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 2006-August-01
  • Location:Czech Republic

Posted 2007-April-06, 06:24

Hi all,

I am trying to design system based on Magic Diamond structure and actualy I am stucked in 1D structure. The original structure after 1H negative (0-7 any hand) is to complex.

I am looking for structure that could be conventional but not relays and prefer as naturalish as possible continuations. Any experiences or suggestions?

Regards
Pavel
0

#2 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2007-April-06, 06:42

1 as second positive, rest natural is simplest but not optimal. I guess better would be reverse the majors and the minors, i.e.

2 = 4+
2 = 4+
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#3 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2007-April-06, 07:52

I'd suggest the following:

After 1-?
1 = semipositive (5-7 or so)
1 = double negative
1NT+ = GF, whatever structure you use

After 1-1-?
1 = relay, GF (opener responds 1NT+, the structure you use for initial GF hands, so no extra memory load here)
Other bids natural and not GF

After 1-1-?
Whatever you prefer after double negatives. I like 2 as strong and rest canapé transfers.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#4 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,510
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2007-April-06, 07:56

Hi There

Back in the day, when I was playing arround with Magic Diamond, I found it easiest to adopt control showing response like the ones used in old style Blue Team Club.

I don't claim that this structure was in any way optimal, however, it did have the benefit of being very simple.
Alderaan delenda est
0

#5 User is offline   NickToll 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 62
  • Joined: 2005-January-07
  • Location:Modena - Italy

Posted 2007-April-06, 10:56

Years ago, I used to play a strong diamond system (17+). My partner and I had a very simple development over 1:

1 - 1: negative or super-positive (14+); I think super-positive can be be dropped without any serious loss
1 - 1: 8-13, GF unbalanced; here, opener's 1NT suggests no special suit
1 - 1NT: 8-13, GF balanced; here, opener's 2NT shows a balanced hand with one or both four-card majors or slam interest
1 - 2suit: 5-7, fair 6card suit

1 - 1 - 1: 17-20, unbalanced, no good suit, typically a 5.4
1 - 1 - 1NT: 17-20, balanced
1 - 1 - 2suit: 17+, natural, 1RF; if minimum, good suit
1 - 1 - 2NT: 21-23, balanced (with 24+, rebid 2 over 1, then 2NT)
1 - 1 - 3suit: 21+, 3suiter, shortness in the same ranking suit (e.g., 3 = short diamonds)

1 - 1 - 1 - 1NT: double negative
1 - 1 - 1 - 2suit: 5-7, natural, even a four-card suit
1 - 1 - 1 - 2NT+: super-positive, natural

1 - 1 - 1NT: your favourite notrump system will do fine

1 - 1 - 2suit - 1st step: double negative; here opener's suit rebid is not forcing, a new suit is forcing one round
1 - 1 - 2suit - others: natural and at least semi-positive; a new suit can be bid with four cards only
1 - 1 - 2suit - 2NT: four or more cards in the 1st step suit, at least semi-positive

Very, very simple and natural, with a reasonable chance to find the best fit within the three level (we used Italian cue-bids in the slam auctions). Surely not the most efficient development after 1, but with a good results-to-effort ratio...
Selling is the second oldest profession, often confused with the first.
(Mahan Khalsa)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users