Would you bid with this hand? 2nd seat Red
#1
Posted 2007-February-14, 08:47
♥ QJ7643
♦ Q64
♣ K93
You are vul against not, RHO dealt and opens 1 spade. Do you make a call?
If it matters, your partner is somebody you've played against before and you know her to be good, but this is your first time playing together, and you have no special agreements.
#3
Posted 2007-February-14, 09:41
If partner was a passed hand, I would bid 2H,
but he is not.
3H at this colors is not my cup off coffee.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2007-February-14, 09:52
Not vul, it would be an easy 3H.
Peter
#5
Posted 2007-February-14, 10:19
#8
Posted 2007-February-14, 10:51
inquiry, on Feb 14 2007, 11:34 AM, said:
Nope, just making sure that I wasn't off-base when I thought this pass was automatic.
#10
Posted 2007-February-14, 13:17
And I think I know where this hand comes from
![:)](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
#11
Posted 2007-February-14, 17:38
pbleighton, on Feb 14 2007, 10:52 AM, said:
Not vul, it would be an easy 3H.
Peter
ditto.
BebopKid (Bryan Lee Williams)
"I've practiced meditation most of my life. It's better than sitting around doing nothing."
(Tom Sims, from topfive.com)
♦♦♦♦♦♦
#12
Posted 2007-February-14, 18:38
not even close
my Vul 2-level overcalls, especially at unfavorable, tend to be rather sound. Why promise values that I don't have? especially when my partner hasn't made his or her usual bid of "pass" yet? 2nd seat, I usually keep my bids sound (unless maybe in spades).
What is going on with this hand? Did the opps bid a pre-emptive 3S and partner couldn't act, resulting in a missed 4H contract?
Maybe it's becoming necessary to totally change the philosophy of defensive bidding to where jump-overcalls are intermediate, and immediate Xs and overcalls are transfers to a known suit, either weak or strong. Hmmmm. maybe not such a bad idea................Hey, who hit me?
DHL
#13
Posted 2007-February-14, 19:12
Double !, on Feb 14 2007, 07:38 PM, said:
Nope, nothing so exciting. See Walddk's thread if you'd like.
His question was do you balance after 1♠-P-P, with unfavorable vulnerability, so I wanted to see how offensive a hand I could make and people would still pass with it.
I'm wondering if, thanks to the person in the direct seat needing to be so much stronger when vulnerable, if one needs to balance with hands when vulnerable that would pass when not vulnerable.
#14
Posted 2007-February-15, 05:53
Quote
It's on the LINE!
No it isn't...
Let's just say that bidding 2♥ will probably decrease your chances of asking her out for a drink afterwards.