BBO Discussion Forums: Computer bridge programs - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Computer bridge programs Considering buying one

#1 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-January-11, 16:07

I am considering buying a bridge program, and would be interested in some advice/experiences etc.

I think I am less interested in actually playing against them and more interested in using them for simulations. Here are a couple of things I would find useful:
  • Be able to do simulations based on actually playing out the hand single-dummy (instead of just a double dummy analysis). E.g. for a lead analysis, I would like the program to play out every random dealt hand a couple of times, once for each specified lead.
  • Obviously a good deal generator (i.e. with arbitrary constraints, or constraints given by an auction assuming some standard system)
  • Maybe the possibility to use an external random dealer instead.
  • More generally, being able to script the program would be nice. (I.e. if the first point can't be done directly, I might write my own scripts to do this if the program has a well-documented command line interface.) I would imagine that any pre-programmed simulation setup via a GUI will be too limited at times.
  • Being able to "play out auctions" at times would be nice. E.g. after a 3D opening on your right, specify either a 3H bid or double, and let the program finish the auction and report the result (most preferably IMPing the two results against each other...)
  • For all these simulations, it would be nice if there were a good way to inspect the results, i.e. show the deals where action A worked at least 5 IMPs better than action B etc...
  • Oh, I guess it should play well, too!

I guess I am asking for a lot :P Does any of the well-known programs even come close to that?

Thanks, Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#2 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-January-11, 16:13

Don't buy gib, you will be disappointed :P
0

#3 User is offline   jmc 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 256
  • Joined: 2006-March-24

Posted 2007-January-11, 17:25

I am also curious in what software people are using for hand generation and then analysis. I have often wondered how to see what shape is more likely in order to make system choices (ie unusual positive vs. 7-card semi-positive) and I would welcome any suggestions.

jmc
0

#4 User is offline   chicken 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 207
  • Joined: 2004-September-09

Posted 2007-January-12, 02:28

i have been using my bundle for 3 years now and i am totally satisfied with:

dealing/converting ----> dealmaster pro
analysing---> deep finesse implemented in dealmaster pro combined with ---->bridgebrowser
additional stuff especially presentation and playing ----> jack
Kom kit´cha vangar´th, kin patakh´ch vananch, pargh?

If it´s not important to win, tell me, why do they keep records?

(Barcht, Captain of Nir`ch Tyse´th, Klingon Warship)



www.bridgeball.de
0

#5 User is offline   pdmunro 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 265
  • Joined: 2003-July-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-January-12, 04:49

One resource that I have not seen utilised is Richard Pavlicek's "Deal Finder".

http://www.rpbridge.net/rpbr.htm#11

It is a database of 2 million deals that he has thoroughly double-dummy analysed.
Peter . . . . AKQ . . . . K = 3 points = 1 trick
"Of course wishes everybody to win and play as good as possible, but it is a hobby and a game, not war." 42 (BBO Forums)
"If a man speaks in the forest and there are no women around to hear is he still wrong?" anon
"Politics: an inadequate substitute for bridge." John Maynard Keynes
"This is how Europe works, it dithers, it delays, it makes cowardly small steps towards the truth and at some point that which it has admonished as impossible it embraces as inevitable." Athens University economist Yanis Varoufakis
"Krypt3ia @ Craig, dude, don't even get me started on you. You have posted so far two articles that I and others have found patently clueless. So please, step away from the keyboard before you hurt yourself." Comment on infosecisland.com
"Doing is the real hard part" Emma Coats (formerly from Pixar)
"I was working on the proof of one of my poems all the morning, and took out a comma. In the afternoon I put it back again." Oscar Wilde
"Assessment, far more than religion, has become the opiate of the people" Patricia Broadfoot, Uni of Gloucestershire, UK
0

#6 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2007-January-12, 09:49

What's the story with GIB (the product) anyway? Is it no longer being supported or updated or something?
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users