Walddk, on Dec 6 2006, 12:15 PM, said:
Dealer: | North | Vul: | N/S | Scoring: | IMP | | | | ♠ | Q6 | ♥ | Q106 | ♦ | KJ632 | ♣ | Q54 | | | ♠ | K854 | ♥ | A95 | ♦ | 875 | ♣ | 1087 | | | | |
A hand from the Danish Premier League last weekend.
Pass Pass Pass 1NT*
2
♣** 3NT Pass Pass
Pass
* 15-17.
** majors.
Lead:
♥2 (3rd and 5th).
Low from dummy. How do you defend?
Roland
Here's what we know:
- declarer is marked with (probably) the
♥J from his duck from dummy.
- partner is probably 5-5 since he is at unfavorable, doesn't have many HCP, and has poor suits.
This makes declarer most likely 2236 or 2245 most likely. Let's assume for the sake of argument that declarer is 2236, although it doesnt really matter. Now we have to decide if it is more likely that declarer has A9 Jx Qxx AKJxxx or xx Jx AQx AKJxxx. Partner has AJ10xx Kxxxx x xx in the former case and J10xxx Kxxxx A xx in the latter case.
I think partner would have led a spade from J109xx rather than from Kxxxx, so it seems like playing declarer for the
♠A also requires declarer to hold the
♠9. On the other hand, declarer is less likely to have opened 1NT with just a jack in the majors (and only 4-5 major suit cards to boot). I think partner is equally likely to have bid over 1NT with either hand.
My experience has shown that in guess siutations it's best not to make too many assumptions about the opponents' decision making process in the bidding, so I will go ahead and play the
♠K.