Who can make a case for 2♠ being natural? I ran into a hand today where I would have liked it to be the case but didn't want to confuse partner so I passed.
Page 1 of 1
Natural or not?
#1
Posted 2006-December-02, 00:58
(1♦)-X-(1♠)-P-(1N/2♣/2♦)-2♠
Who can make a case for 2♠ being natural? I ran into a hand today where I would have liked it to be the case but didn't want to confuse partner so I passed.
Who can make a case for 2♠ being natural? I ran into a hand today where I would have liked it to be the case but didn't want to confuse partner so I passed.
#2
Posted 2006-December-02, 01:06
You doubled with one of three hand types:
1. A "classic" takeout double, short in diamonds, roughly opening values or better, support for the unbid suits.
2. A hand too strong for a simple overcall.
3. A "rock crusher" 3 suiter, one with which Goren would have cue bid.
You didn't cue bid diamonds, so you don't have type 3. You did bid a new suit, so you almost certainly have type 2. So 2 spades is natural. With luck, you might even make it. :-)
1. A "classic" takeout double, short in diamonds, roughly opening values or better, support for the unbid suits.
2. A hand too strong for a simple overcall.
3. A "rock crusher" 3 suiter, one with which Goren would have cue bid.
You didn't cue bid diamonds, so you don't have type 3. You did bid a new suit, so you almost certainly have type 2. So 2 spades is natural. With luck, you might even make it. :-)
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#3
Posted 2006-December-02, 02:08
I'm a 1♠ overcaller. Yeah it's heavy, but not by a lot. I can then double later confident that partner knows I have spades. Whether 2♠ is natural now, I can see the argument for it to be. But I understand your reluctance to take the chance.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
#4
Posted 2006-December-02, 04:37
I'm also a 1♠ overcaller, the Double will come later...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#5
Posted 2006-December-02, 04:42
A bid of 2♠ by either you now or by your partner on the first round should be natural.
A very strong classic take-out double shape can double a 2♣ rebid for penalties or a 2♦ rebid for more take-out.
A very strong classic take-out double shape can double a 2♣ rebid for penalties or a 2♦ rebid for more take-out.
#6
Posted 2006-December-02, 05:54
2♠ on the second round is certainly natural, showing a good hand.
On your actual hand I would have overcalled 1♠ on the first round as it happens, but make the hand slightly stronger and that's exactly what this sequence shows - a hand too good to overcall spades on the first round.
On your actual hand I would have overcalled 1♠ on the first round as it happens, but make the hand slightly stronger and that's exactly what this sequence shows - a hand too good to overcall spades on the first round.
#8
Posted 2006-December-02, 09:19
For me, this hand is 1HCP too good to overcall since due to its potential I fear PD will pass hands where we have game and with this many HCP, I may not be saved by the opps coming back into the auction. There are plenty of random 17 HCP hands where I'll overcall but this is too strong for me.
So 2♠ here is 100% natural and also some prevention from 1♠ being somewhat of a psyche by responder.
If I have a monster 3 suiter I can double again or Q bid ♦ depending on agreement with PD as to which shows a decent hand with really long ♦ and which suits bid by responder where my double may be penalty.
If I have a real good hand with a few ♦'s I may have been able to overcall 1NT.
So 2♠ here is 100% natural and also some prevention from 1♠ being somewhat of a psyche by responder.
If I have a monster 3 suiter I can double again or Q bid ♦ depending on agreement with PD as to which shows a decent hand with really long ♦ and which suits bid by responder where my double may be penalty.
If I have a real good hand with a few ♦'s I may have been able to overcall 1NT.
#9
Posted 2006-December-02, 11:01
I think 2♠ is natural. 2♦ (you can never have ♦'s here) can be the cue.
"Phil" on BBO
#10
Posted 2006-December-02, 11:21
Jlall, on Dec 2 2006, 04:03 PM, said:
2S is 100 % natural.
Only? Shows pretty good spades, so I would give it 150%
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#11
Posted 2006-December-07, 20:55
2♠ is natural of course. What else should it be?
D+♠ and 1♠ overcall are both ok, I think.
My partner and I love to bid the opponents' suits. Try this one from last Sunday:
(1♥) - pass - (1NT) - pass,
(pass) - 2♥! - (pass) - 3♥!!,
all pass.
9 tricks. (No, 1♥ wasn't bluff :-))
D+♠ and 1♠ overcall are both ok, I think.
My partner and I love to bid the opponents' suits. Try this one from last Sunday:
(1♥) - pass - (1NT) - pass,
(pass) - 2♥! - (pass) - 3♥!!,
all pass.
9 tricks. (No, 1♥ wasn't bluff :-))
Michael Askgaard
Page 1 of 1