Raising? Three count
#2
Posted 2006-December-03, 19:52
Peter
#4
Posted 2006-December-03, 21:47
I will pass again
I will lead a ♣
#6
Posted 2006-December-04, 05:56
#9
Posted 2006-December-04, 09:12
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#10
Posted 2006-December-04, 09:45
Having passed: the 'normal' lead looks like the ♠Q, but I doubt there is any hurry in that suit. The opps rate to hold 7+ cards in ♠s so their losers there are not disappearing very often. On the other hand, it is quite possible that declarer has a good red 2-suiter and that a ♣ loser may be going away, so I lead a ♣.
Ax AJ10xx AQJxx x opposite xxxxx Qxxx Kxx x is the kind of layout to be worried about.
#11
Posted 2006-December-04, 09:57
Roland
#12
Posted 2006-December-04, 10:00
Walddk, on Dec 4 2006, 04:57 PM, said:
Sorry - system is strong NT, better minor.
#13
Posted 2006-December-04, 10:34
Quote
Not least because 5♣ only costs 300 since partner holds Kxx Kx x AKQJxxx
(Okay they can make 5♥ )
#14
Posted 2006-December-04, 10:41
hatchett, on Dec 4 2006, 11:34 AM, said:
Quote
Not least because 5♣ only costs 300 since partner holds Kxx Kx x AKQJxxx
(Okay they can make 5♥ )
I hate it when I am taken literally
The decision to bid or defend is based on a wide range of hand types and expectancies. The bulk of hand types will lead to 500 or worse. Having decided to defend, the decision about opening lead can be based on other considerations: on most layouts, leading either black suit will usually break even, but there will be a set of hands on which one black suit will fare better than the other. My concern was that, when it mattered, a ♣ lead was most likely to be essential... not to set the contract but to save a precious overtrick.
#15
Posted 2006-December-04, 11:08
MickyB, on Dec 3 2006, 09:44 PM, said:
1♣-(1♥)-Pass-(2♥)
3♣-(4♥)-?
Do you agree with your initial pass? Do you now pass or bid 5♣? If you pass, what's your lead?
Kx
x
AKx
AKxxxxx
This looks like a reasonable hand for pard.
hm....5♣ is cold, so I bid it.
Yeah, the first pass is normal. The only initial raise i'd make is if pard had opened 1♠ and RHO had doubled. The preemptive value is too great to ignore.
#17
Posted 2006-December-04, 15:15
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#18
Posted 2006-December-05, 06:51
Glad to see my 5♣ bid had some support. Apologies for the lead question - at the table I decided that a club lead would have let 4♥ make, I've only just realised that it does not!
#19
Posted 2006-December-05, 09:32
MickyB, on Dec 5 2006, 08:51 AM, said:
Glad to see my 5♣ bid had some support. Apologies for the lead question - at the table I decided that a club lead would have let 4♥ make, I've only just realised that it does not!
1nt opening would have saved the day here
1♣-(1♥)-Pass-(2♥)
3♣-(4♥)-?
Do you agree with your initial pass? Do you now pass or bid 5♣? If you pass, what's your lead?