2H-3H-P-3NT
#2
Posted 2006-November-18, 19:13
pbleighton, on Nov 19 2006, 02:43 AM, said:
To play.
#3
Posted 2006-November-18, 19:58
3 NT is holy....
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
Posted 2006-November-18, 20:08
#5
Posted 2006-November-19, 03:14
#6
Posted 2006-November-19, 03:19
a strong relais, but you have better discussed
this with partner.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2006-November-21, 18:48
THe advantages of the method I use is:-
a) showing fits (double fits) early
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15240/15240b5c98010b5d775ef9a2d6fd59714089cdda" alt="B)"
c) allowing for better invitational auctions (eg a level lower)
d) rarely for me - simplicity!!
I doubt that such methods are standard - and in hte absence of specific agreement a 3NT would be assumed to be to play....so I'm with Marlowe.
regards
#9
Posted 2006-November-21, 19:26
pbleighton, on Nov 18 2006, 07:43 PM, said:
3NT is a disaster waiting to happen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e60ed/e60edf06f60affc4ec65b07914f352c3755100d1" alt=":D"
I submit that Michaels over a weak two is not the best meaning of the cuebid, but if you're going to play it, you certainly have to discuss how to ask for the minor, and in particular what 3NT means.
Absent discussion, it should be to play.
I like Roman Jump Overcalls here, so with spades and clubs, I bid 3♠, and with spades and diamonds, I bid 4♦. The cuebid would ask partner to bid 3NT with a ♥ stopper. So in the given auction, 3NT would show a heart stopper (and not necessarily anything else).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15240/15240b5c98010b5d775ef9a2d6fd59714089cdda" alt="B)"
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#10
Posted 2006-November-22, 01:20
However the generic sequences are relevant, and IF one was compelled to play such methods, the issue fo responding to 2 suiters at this level arises in many competitve circumstances.
regards
#11
Posted 2006-November-22, 01:22
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4c04/e4c04af6171f715eac55af5d6d276f5e52e2cf73" alt="B)"
♥ stop and no good support for spades. I would understand 4♥ to be "bid your minor".
George Carlin
#12
Posted 2006-November-22, 02:59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd20/0dd207db57e6c9c8de9c9d0b4299e4c8282a573e" alt="B)"
Sean
#13
Posted 2006-November-22, 04:05
In this case, absent agreement, 3NT should be to play. Either 4♥ or 4♣ (pass/correct) sounds like an intelligent way to find the minor, but 3NT is just to valuable a final contract to sacrifice.
#14
Posted 2006-November-22, 06:37
You can bid 4m pass-or-correct
You can bid 4NT to play in partner's minor at the 5-level
You can bid 4H with various slam tries
You can agree to play 3H as game forcing, then you can easily find out partner's minor by bidding 4C. If you don't want to play 3H as FG ou can't find out partner's minor and play in 4S or 5m if it's the right minor.