How to treat this Bidding problem
#1
Posted 2006-February-16, 07:36
♥KTxxx
♦AKT8xx
♣-
You play 5cm, better minor, light 2/1 [9-10+]. In a Gold Cup match, you're dealer and I vulnerable against not. You have several ways to treat this:
1) Lie about your sixth diamond by opening 1H and rebidding diamonds ad infinitum [possibly supporting spades later on]
2) Lie about your fifth and potentially fourth heart by opening 1D and rebidding 2D over 2C
3) Lie about your strength by opening 1D and rebidding 2H over 2C.
4) Pass to begin with and let the problem sort itself out later on
What do you think of each of these ways? At the table, I chose an option which was soundly criticised by all present, including me. When I got to thinking about the hand, I decided my option wasn't so bad, and is in fact reasonable.
Advice welcome.
J
#2
Posted 2006-February-16, 07:53
Peter
#3
Posted 2006-February-16, 08:06
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76e7c/76e7c83357a8810ac6243165f60c4989ee4e25a1" alt=":D"
#4
Posted 2006-February-16, 08:16
I don't think any of the rest are totally unreasonable.
It's not quite the right vulnerability for (4) which is an option that can work very well at times. If it goes P 1S P 4S you are committed to acting now which is slightly uncomfortable at red.
I would probably go for (2). Many uncontested game auctions will give me a chance to get hearts bid, and if the opponents are going to bid spades I'd rather have opened my best suit.
I don't mind (1) either.
#5
Posted 2006-February-16, 08:18
I prefer opening 1♦
Rebidding 2♦
With luck, I might be able to show hearts later on. I don't mind taking some liberties and bidding a 5 card major ahead of a six card minor. With this said and done, the disparity in suit quality argues against this.
Personally, I think that the hand is too strong to pass initially unless I'm playing a very sound opening system. Equally significant, this is no where near enough to consider a reverse.
One question about option (3). There is a big difference between the auction
1♦ - 1N - 2♥ and
1♦ - 2♣ - 2♥
For some pairs, the bottom sequence doesn't even promise a "classic" reverse, but simply shows a stopper... I'm not in that camp, but it does exist
#6
Posted 2006-February-16, 08:33
(Other than you could argue that you aren't 'lying' as you haven't denied 5 hearts by bidding this way).
#7
Posted 2006-February-16, 08:36
Arend
#8
Posted 2006-February-16, 08:42
FrancesHinden, on Feb 16 2006, 05:33 PM, said:
(Other than you could argue that you aren't 'lying' as you haven't denied 5 hearts by bidding this way).
E is a letter and 2 is a number?
On a more serious note, I should have simply voted for choice 2.
Moreover, I think I should have gone to bed earlier than 2:00 AM.
#9
Posted 2006-February-16, 08:45
I would open 1H, intending to
show 5-5.
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#10
Posted 2006-February-16, 08:53
Keep 1♦ with 2 hearts bids in store to show GOOD hands (14HCP in the two suits minimum).
So far I had no major distaster with this approach.
#11
Posted 2006-February-16, 09:22
P_Marlowe, on Feb 16 2006, 03:45 PM, said:
I would open 1H, intending to
show 5-5.
Marlowe
Same for me !
A ♥ support can be enough for game and the best way to know it is opening in ♥.
IMHO, you go nowhere by opening in ♦ cause you don't have enough to show you ♥ suit.
Alain
#12
Posted 2006-February-16, 10:47
#13
Posted 2006-February-16, 10:53
mikeh, on Feb 16 2006, 05:47 PM, said:
Sighhhh. I have to agree with my enemy from Canada. But I'll get my revenge soon when the Danish curling women thrash the Canadians
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd20/0dd207db57e6c9c8de9c9d0b4299e4c8282a573e" alt=":D"
Roland
#14
Posted 2006-February-16, 11:01
Walddk, on Feb 16 2006, 11:53 AM, said:
mikeh, on Feb 16 2006, 05:47 PM, said:
Sighhhh. I have to agree with my enemy from Canada. But I'll get my revenge soon when the Danish curling women thrash the Canadians
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd20/0dd207db57e6c9c8de9c9d0b4299e4c8282a573e" alt=":D"
Roland
I have already made arrangements (by winning a bet) to trade 1kg of Nanaimo bars for 1kg of danish pastries in Verona in June (provided that I can smuggle the nanaimo bars into Italy). Want to make it double or nothing, Roland? Of course, what any one (or any country, for that matter) would do with 2kg of nanaimo bars boggles the imagination (to say nothing of what it would do to the stomach)
Maybe we could also wager on the Danish women's hockey team against the Canadians? (who won their first two matches by a combined score of 28-0)
#15
Posted 2006-February-16, 11:04
mikeh, on Feb 16 2006, 06:01 PM, said:
Sure, and you are bound to lose! Why? Because we don't have a women's hockey team at the Olympics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e60ed/e60edf06f60affc4ec65b07914f352c3755100d1" alt=":D"
Roland
#16
Posted 2006-February-16, 11:20
I hope I understood your notes correctly that 2/1 is 100% game force not Acol style.
1d and then 2h over 2clubs. Opening lite, 2H rebid does not promise more than this strength.
Yes, that means 2H may be 9 -20 hcp. Partner assumes the lower range for now.
#19
Posted 2006-February-16, 16:11
- hrothgar
#20
Posted 2006-February-17, 03:41
I had been closer to open 2 Heart (as a two suiter with a minor) then to a reverse. After all, I am vul. against not in first seat, so my weak openings can have up to eleven HCPS. I just upgraded, because the suits are very pure....
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...