BBO Discussion Forums: 5N? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5N?

Poll: 5N? (26 member(s) have cast votes)

Your next bid is ...?

  1. Pass (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 6H (2 votes [7.69%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.69%

  3. 6S (17 votes [65.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 65.38%

  4. 7H (1 votes [3.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.85%

  5. 7S (4 votes [15.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.38%

  6. Other (2 votes [7.69%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.69%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   LH2650 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 2004-September-29

Posted 2011-March-23, 20:27



Partner opens, and you are playing 2/1 Game Force. Are you happy with your bidding so far? What is your call? If you interpret partner's 5N as Grand Slam Force, 6 would be your weakest response, and 6 would show one of the top 3 honors with something extra.
0

#2 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-March-24, 08:07

I interpret grand slam force, as far as I know I have a 6 response and that's what I'd bid, if you have other agreements and my answer must be 6 I bid that
0

#3 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-March-24, 09:17

I'm not particularly happy, since I have a nice hand in support of spades, and 4 doesn't do justice. I would prefer 4 (which should be a spade flag) or at least 4.

I really don't know what 5N is, but I doubt partner has the right hand for it whatever he intended it as.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#4 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2011-March-24, 09:18

Agree with Fluf
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#5 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2011-March-24, 09:33

View PostLH2650, on 2011-March-23, 20:27, said:



If you interpret partner's 5N as Grand Slam Force, 6 would be your weakest response, and 6 would show one of the top 3 honors with something extra.

You have ONE of the top 3 AND "something else" -- K ( as well as the 3 other controls in the minors ).

Partner must be void in one of the minors -- I'm not sure which : 5 6 ( 2 0 or 0 2 ) -- other wise he would bid 4NT ( RKC ).

If he is A x or K x, you are probably cold for 7S.... but how to know ?

.....Surely he wouldn't bid 5NT with Q x ( or worse ), so I'm putting him on A x and void.

I'd like to bid 7S, but what if he is missing one of the top 3 honors ?

Heck, the grand may still be on a hook ..... sooo,

I'll just bid 7S and be done with it !
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#6 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-March-24, 14:24

6, you answered your own question in the OP.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#7 User is offline   chasetb 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 879
  • Joined: 2009-December-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk, backwater USA

Posted 2011-March-24, 14:52

TWO is trying to think outside the box, but I see it there is no box on this hand. You have 6 controls and one of the top three honors, 6 wtp
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."

"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."

"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."

-Alfred Sheinwold
0

#8 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2011-March-24, 15:52

I don't get it. How can this possibly be a GSF?

I have not shown any controls and partner says that the grand depends on my spade holding only?!? I can buy that aces in the minors are not relevant. After all, partner could well have minor voids. But how can the K be unimportant? It just doesn't exist.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#9 User is offline   chasetb 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 879
  • Joined: 2009-December-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk, backwater USA

Posted 2011-March-24, 16:02

View PostTrinidad, on 2011-March-24, 15:52, said:

I don't get it. How can this possibly be a GSF?

I have not shown any controls and partner says that the grand depends on my spade holding only?!? I can buy that aces in the minors are not relevant. After all, partner could well have minor voids. But how can the K be unimportant? It just doesn't exist.

Rik


Partner has shown at least 6 and 5 as well as extra values. When you chose Spades, you showed shortness in , which implies that with the 5NT bid (s)he has the A as well as the K and/or Q, and probably A and a Diamond void. Partner was willing to go to 6 opposite you having NO help in Spades, yet you have both the A and the K, which he shouldn't expect you to have, not to mention the K and A. This hand clearly exists, and is worth 6 since they have agreements over GSF.
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."

"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."

"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."

-Alfred Sheinwold
0

#10 User is offline   manudude03 

  • - - A AKQJT9876543
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,615
  • Joined: 2007-October-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-March-24, 16:29

I must confess to being the 6H bidder. It is partially influenced by my own preferences with the responses to GSF. For me, this logically shows 1 of the top 3 and a card. Given that partner bid 5NT with no information about our controls, he probably only cares about the majors (AQJxx AQJTxxx void A maybe if that isn't a 2C opener).
Wayne Somerville
0

#11 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-March-24, 16:59

Partner clearly has something like ??xxx AQJxxx - Ax, substitute whatever spades you would like for the "?"... Regardless the correct bid is still 6.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#12 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-March-24, 18:33

I expect partner has KQJxx AQJxxxxx - -
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#13 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2011-March-24, 22:48

View Postmtvesuvius, on 2011-March-24, 16:59, said:

Partner clearly has something like ??xxx AQJxxx - Ax, substitute whatever spades you would like for the "?"... Regardless the correct bid is still 6.


unless i've somehow shown the K in the auction (did I?) I am not sure how 5n can be gsf with this hand, i could easily be 32 in the majors with two baby hearts... I almost feel like a H?xxx AQJxxx Kx -- is more likely, fishing for a 62 diamond fit.
0

#14 User is offline   LH2650 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 2004-September-29

Posted 2011-March-25, 06:58



At the local club, no one managed to reach a grand slam with these cards, and no progress was made in the post mortem. Any suggestions?
0

#15 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2011-March-25, 08:52

View PostLH2650, on 2011-March-25, 06:58, said:



At the local club, no one managed to reach a grand slam with these cards, and no progress was made in the post mortem. Any suggestions?


We could get to 7, via 2C-2D-3H (easy to find out about heart king and spade ace immediately). But that would require opener to focus on hearts being trump before the auction starts, and might not be wise without the heart jack.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#16 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-March-25, 09:21

wd Gnasher :)
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#17 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2011-March-25, 09:25

View Postaguahombre, on 2011-March-25, 08:52, said:

We could get to 7, via 2C-2D-3H (easy to find out about heart king and spade ace immediately). But that would require opener to focus on hearts being trump before the auction starts, and might not be wise without the heart jack.

I like Aquaman's 2C open suggestion, "initially" setting Hts as trump and demanding cuebids:

2C - 2D
3H(jump) - 3S
5NT! - 6D ( or 6H ) = one of the top 3 Ht honors
7S ( hoping that the Sp cue was NOT a VOID ! )
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#18 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2011-March-25, 09:26

View PostLH2650, on 2011-March-25, 06:58, said:



At the local club, no one managed to reach a grand slam with these cards, and no progress was made in the post mortem. Any suggestions?


I suspected that opener's hand was something like this.

In my opinion, 5NT has to be a GSF if the partnership plays GSF. The fact that I hold the K and an outside ace causes me to think that partner's hand may not be an ideal GSF, but that doesn't change the partnership agreement. So I answer the question that he asked. It may or may not get us to the right spot, but I am not in a position to overrule partner.

Given that the partnership is playing an unusual form of GSF that allows an answer of "a top honor and something extra," partner's GSF is not a bad choice. Responder should realize that opener must have a 5-8 or 6-7 hand to make this call, and the "something extra" can only be a missing heart honor in addition to a missing spade honor. So, responder has what opener is looking for. But I would not jump to 7. Partner can bid 7 himself. Who knows? Maybe partner was being very creative, and the 6 "I have a top honor and something extra" response will not be enough for him to bid the grand.
0

#19 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-March-25, 12:42

If pard bids 5NT over my wimpish 4 response, he can't be weary of a minor suit loser, so I guess he has like a 5701 with singleton ace of clubs. If I trust pard, I'll probably bid 7. If not, I'll settle for 6, as 5NT might already be a silly bid :)
0

#20 User is offline   chasetb 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 879
  • Joined: 2009-December-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk, backwater USA

Posted 2011-March-25, 12:57

View PostArtK78, on 2011-March-25, 09:26, said:

Responder should realize that opener must have a 5-8 or 6-7 hand to make this call, and the "something extra" can only be a missing heart honor in addition to a missing spade honor. So, responder has what opener is looking for. But I would not jump to 7. Partner can bid 7 himself.

Partner wouldn't have a 5-8 hand, otherwise his/her 3rd bid should have been a jump to 4. Therefore, it's either 5-6 and no worries about the minors or 6-7. I do agree with you, as do most of us sane people here, that the hand is

If you want to get there (easily?), play Precision Club and open that hand 1. For me, it would go: 1-2(positive transfer to ); 4(Majors)-7. If not, follow the bidding sequence outlined in the very first post, adding 6 and 7 to the end.
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."

"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."

"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."

-Alfred Sheinwold
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users