How low do you go?
#1
Posted 2008-June-09, 17:27
p-p-p in you, White v Red at MP
♠AJ2 ♥T94 ♦AT97 ♣AJ6
EDIT: Sorry, AT97 of ♦, not KT97
#2
Posted 2008-June-09, 17:37
1♦
(After the edit) OK, probably I still open 1♦, but 1NT is also reasonable.
This post has been edited by 655321: 2008-June-09, 17:49
#5
Posted 2008-June-09, 17:49
1♦ for me.
#7
Posted 2008-June-09, 18:01
I am all for tactical NT bids, but this doesn't qualify. I am not unhappy at all if the opponents declare (especially when they are red), and my hand sucks.
#8
Posted 2008-June-09, 18:05
pclayton, on Jun 10 2008, 12:49 AM, said:
It also has three aces and two 109s. I'd probably upgrade this.
#9
Posted 2008-June-09, 19:10
gnasher, on Jun 9 2008, 07:05 PM, said:
pclayton, on Jun 10 2008, 12:49 AM, said:
It also has three aces and two 109s. I'd probably upgrade this.
no upgrade for flat 4333 for me. 1D
We never know from day to day which ones we'll have to eat.
#11
Posted 2008-June-09, 20:19
But, I play 14-16 in this seat and would open 1NT myself. I like the lower range here.
-P.J. Painter.
#12
Posted 2008-June-09, 21:24
#13
Posted 2008-June-09, 22:43
#14
Posted 2008-June-10, 00:25
#15
Posted 2008-June-10, 06:35
TylerE, on Jun 9 2008, 06:27 PM, said:
p-p-p in you, White v Red at MP
♠AJ2 ♥T94 ♦AT97 ♣AJ6
You have no 4 card major; the aces tens and nines are good; but the shape is dull.
#18
Posted 2008-June-11, 14:49
#20
Posted 2008-June-11, 20:38
Apollo81, on Jun 12 2008, 03:49 AM, said:
I agree with nearly all of this post, just remove the word "gross".